A Celebration of 5000 ODIs Match 11: 22 From One Ball Ends South Africa’s World Cup Dream
South Africa were closing on their first World Cup final when 12 minutes of Sydney rain turned a demanding chase into cricket’s most infamous impossible equation.
South Africa needed 22 runs from 13 balls. Brian McMillan and Dave Richardson were still there. A place in the World Cup final remained difficult, but entirely possible.
Then Sydney’s rain arrived.
Twelve minutes later, the equation that had taken almost seven hours of cricket to create had become impossible. The giant SCG scoreboard flashed the numbers that would follow South African cricket for decades: 22 runs required from one ball.
There is an important detail behind that famous image. Archived match records show the scoreboard was actually wrong. Under the calculation eventually applied, South Africa’s true requirement was 21 from the final delivery. It hardly mattered. No legal delivery could produce either number. The semifinal had effectively ended in a calculation rather than a cricketing contest.
That extraordinary finish is why England’s 19-run victory on March 22, 1992, is Match 11 in The Sports Encounter’s A Celebration of 5000 ODIs series. The match gave us Graeme Hick’s finest World Cup innings, Jonty Rhodes attacking under knockout pressure, a genuinely competitive chase and, finally, a rain rule so inadequate that cricket was forced to rethink how interrupted matches should be decided.
TL;DR
- England scored 252/6 from 45 overs, led by Graeme Hick’s 83 from 90 balls.
- South Africa reached 231/6 after 42.5 overs and required 22 from the final 13 balls when rain interrupted play.
- The Most Productive Overs method reduced the chase to an impossible final-ball equation.
- Jonty Rhodes made an attacking 43 from 38 balls, while Andrew Hudson top-scored with 46.
- Richard Illingworth and Gladstone Small took two wickets each for England.
- Graeme Hick was Player of the Match as England advanced to the final against Pakistan.
England vs South Africa 1992 World Cup Semifinal: Match Information
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | England vs South Africa, 2nd Semifinal |
| Tournament | 1992 Cricket World Cup |
| Date | March 22, 1992 |
| Venue | Sydney Cricket Ground, Sydney |
| Toss | South Africa won the toss and fielded |
| England | 252/6 in 45 overs |
| South Africa | 232/6 in 43 overs |
| Result | England won by 19 runs under the revised target |
| Player of the Match | Graeme Hick, 83 from 90 balls |
| Top South Africa Batter | Andrew Hudson, 46 from 52 balls |
| Turning Point | Rain with South Africa needing 22 from 13 balls |
| Tournament Impact | England reached the World Cup final |
| Historical Impact | The finish exposed serious flaws in cricket’s rain-adjustment system |
Why Match 11 Belongs in A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
A famous controversy alone would not be enough.
This semifinal deserves its place because a very good cricket match was unfolding before the mathematics swallowed it.
South Africa were playing their first World Cup after returning to international cricket following more than two decades of isolation. They had already reached the semifinals at their first attempt. England, meanwhile, were trying to reach their third World Cup final.
The chase remained alive almost to its natural conclusion.
That combination of historical context, individual performance, knockout pressure and an unprecedented finish satisfies exactly what our 100-match ODI collection was built to preserve. The series has already revisited extraordinary World Cup moments such as Kapil Dev rescuing India from 17 for five against Zimbabwe and India defending 183 against West Indies in the 1983 final.
This one belongs for another reason: cricket eventually learned from it.
Graeme Hick Builds England’s Innings Under Pressure
England lost Graham Gooch for two and Ian Botham for 21, leaving the innings at 39 for two.
Graeme Hick supplied the stability they needed.
His 83 from 90 balls contained nine fours and came at a strike rate above 92, excellent tempo for an ODI semifinal in 1992. He added 71 with Alec Stewart, then helped push England toward a total capable of surviving South Africa’s deep batting order.
Hick’s dismissal at 187 for five could have stalled the innings.
Instead, England found another gear.
Dermot Reeve Turns 220 Into 252
Dermot Reeve’s contribution lasted only 14 balls.
It changed the value of England’s total.
Reeve struck an unbeaten 25 with four boundaries, while Chris Lewis added 18 not out from 16 deliveries. Their late acceleration carried England to 252 for six after the innings had been restricted to 45 overs because South Africa failed to complete their scheduled overs within the allotted time.
Those final runs became even more significant once the chase tightened.
Andrew Hudson Keeps South Africa Moving
South Africa lost captain Kepler Wessels for 17, but Andrew Hudson refused to allow England complete control.
Hudson made 46 from 52 deliveries with six fours and kept the required rate manageable despite regular wickets around him. Peter Kirsten fell for 11 before Hudson departed at 90 for three.
Adrian Kuiper then made 36, but England kept removing batters before partnerships could become decisive.
Richard Illingworth was particularly important, dismissing Hudson and Kuiper while conceding 46 from his 10 overs.
Jonty Rhodes Attacks the Semifinal
Jonty Rhodes produced South Africa’s most aggressive innings.
His 43 from 38 balls pushed the chase forward when the required rate was becoming uncomfortable. England knew one substantial partnership could take the match away from them, and Rhodes was beginning to build exactly that threat.
Gladstone Small eventually removed him with the score on 206.
Yet South Africa were not finished.
McMillan and Richardson took the total to 231 for six. Thirteen legitimate deliveries remained.
They needed 22.
Then the weather intervened.
The 12 Minutes That Changed Cricket’s Rain Rules
The 1992 World Cup used the Most Productive Overs method for rain-affected matches. When overs disappeared from the chasing team’s innings, the target was adjusted by removing the least productive overs from the first innings.
That logic became absurd when rain arrived near the end of this chase.
South Africa had only 13 balls left. Losing two overs therefore removed almost all their remaining opportunities, while England’s target reduction amounted to only one run.
The television and SCG scoreboard famously changed from 22 required from 13 balls, to 22 from seven, and finally 22 from one. Archived ESPN records note that the mathematically correct requirement was actually 21 from one.
McMillan pushed Chris Lewis’ final delivery for a single.
Nobody celebrated the cricket.
England had earned their position and had arguably been the better side over the match, but even they had reached the final through an ending nobody could reasonably defend as a competitive solution. The incident became one of the strongest arguments for developing a more sophisticated method for rain-adjusted targets, eventually leading ODI cricket toward the Duckworth-Lewis system.
Man of the Match: Graeme Hick
Hick’s 83 remains the central performance of the semifinal.
England’s innings repeatedly threatened to lose momentum, and none of their other top-six batters reached 35. Without Hick, there would probably have been no 252 to defend and perhaps no controversy for history to remember.
He therefore deserved the Player of the Match award.
His innings tends to disappear behind the famous scoreboard image, which is unfortunate. The rain rule explains why the match became infamous. Hick explains why England had something worth defending in the first place.
Complete Match Scorecard
England Innings: 252/6 in 45 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graham Gooch | c Richardson b Donald | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Ian Botham | b Pringle | 21 | 23 | 3 | 0 |
| Alec Stewart | c Richardson b McMillan | 33 | 54 | 4 | 0 |
| Graeme Hick | c Rhodes b Snell | 83 | 90 | 9 | 0 |
| Neil Fairbrother | b Pringle | 28 | 50 | 1 | 0 |
| Allan Lamb | c Richardson b Donald | 19 | 22 | 1 | 0 |
| Chris Lewis | not out | 18 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
| Dermot Reeve | not out | 25 | 14 | 4 | 0 |
| Extras | b 1, lb 7, w 9, nb 6 | 23 | |||
| Total | 6 wickets, 45 overs | 252 |
Did not bat: Phil DeFreitas, Gladstone Small, Richard Illingworth.
Fall of wickets: 20-1, 39-2, 110-3, 183-4, 187-5, 221-6.
South Africa Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allan Donald | 10 | 0 | 69 | 2 |
| Meyrick Pringle | 9 | 2 | 36 | 2 |
| Richard Snell | 8 | 0 | 52 | 1 |
| Brian McMillan | 9 | 0 | 47 | 1 |
| Adrian Kuiper | 5 | 0 | 26 | 0 |
| Hansie Cronje | 4 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
South Africa Innings: 232/6 in 43 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kepler Wessels | c Lewis b Botham | 17 | 21 | 1 | 0 |
| Andrew Hudson | lbw b Illingworth | 46 | 52 | 6 | 0 |
| Peter Kirsten | b DeFreitas | 11 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Kuiper | b Illingworth | 36 | 44 | 5 | 0 |
| Hansie Cronje | c Hick b Small | 24 | 46 | 1 | 0 |
| Jonty Rhodes | c Lewis b Small | 43 | 38 | 3 | 0 |
| Brian McMillan | not out | 21 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Dave Richardson | not out | 13 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Extras | lb 17, w 4 | 21 | |||
| Total | 6 wickets, 43 overs | 232 |
Did not bat: Richard Snell, Meyrick Pringle, Allan Donald.
Fall of wickets: 26-1, 61-2, 90-3, 131-4, 176-5, 206-6.
England Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ian Botham | 10 | 0 | 52 | 1 |
| Chris Lewis | 5 | 0 | 38 | 0 |
| Phil DeFreitas | 8 | 1 | 28 | 1 |
| Richard Illingworth | 10 | 1 | 46 | 2 |
| Gladstone Small | 10 | 1 | 51 | 2 |
England Were Better, but South Africa Deserved a Cricketing Finish
It is tempting to retell this semifinal entirely as an injustice.
That loses some of its complexity.
England had made 252 despite being limited to 45 overs. Hick had played the game’s strongest innings. Their bowlers had taken six wickets and repeatedly prevented South Africa from putting together the partnership that could have settled the chase earlier.
South Africa also contributed to their own difficulty by taking too long to bowl England’s innings, which led to the reduction from 50 overs to 45.
Yet none of that makes the final equation sensible.
A World Cup semifinal with 22 required from 13 balls deserved to be decided by players attempting those 13 balls.
That is ultimately why Match 11 survives.
Readers can revisit other matches where a single moment changed a World Cup through our reports on Australia’s seven-run 1987 final victory over England and Gary Gilmour’s extraordinary 1975 semifinal against England, while ongoing match reports and analysis are available through The Sports Encounter Cricket Hub.
Final Takeaway: The Match Cricket Had to Learn From
England advanced to face Pakistan and South Africa went home from their first World Cup carrying an image that would become part of cricket folklore.
The semifinal’s real legacy, however, reaches further than heartbreak.
Hick played a superb innings. Rhodes attacked the chase. England’s bowlers kept the game under pressure. South Africa remained alive with 13 balls remaining.
Then the rules failed the match.
Thirty-four years later, people still remember 22 from one without needing the teams, venue or date explained to them. Few scoreboards in ODI history have said so little while revealing so much about why cricket sometimes has to change.https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/sentinel/frame.html?sv=20260810913b
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs Match 17: Inzamam and Wasim Deny Australia in a Headingley Thriller
Inzamam-ul-Haq rebuilt Pakistan’s innings before Wasim Akram and Saqlain Mushtaq stopped Michael Bevan’s pursuit, sealing a tense 10-run World Cup victory at Headingley.
Australia still needed 62 runs when Michael Bevan watched Steve Waugh’s off stump fly out of the ground. The target remained possible, but Pakistan had released Shoaib Akhtar at precisely the moment when the chase appeared ready to turn.
Bevan carried on. Australia reached 265 with seven deliveries available, leaving 11 runs between Pakistan and a victory that had repeatedly threatened to escape.
Wasim Akram settled the argument himself. Damien Martyn fell to the fourth ball of the final over, and Glenn McGrath lost his stumps two deliveries later. Pakistan had defended 275 by 10 runs after a contest shaped by recoveries, counterattacks and a constant sense that either team could seize control.
The tension and quality on both sides explain why Pakistan versus Australia at Headingley is Match 17 in A Celebration of 5000 ODIs.
TL;DR
- Pakistan beat Australia by 10 runs in their 1999 World Cup group match at Headingley.
- Inzamam-ul-Haq scored 81 after Pakistan slipped to 46/3 and earned Player of the Match.
- Abdul Razzaq supported Inzamam with 60 in a match-defining 118-run partnership.
- Moin Khan’s 31 from 12 balls lifted Pakistan to 275/8.
- Michael Bevan made 61 and kept Australia alive deep into the final over.
- Wasim Akram finished with 4/40, including the final two wickets.
Pakistan vs Australia 1999 World Cup Match Information
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | Pakistan vs Australia, 16th match, Group B |
| Tournament | 1999 ICC Cricket World Cup |
| Date | May 23, 1999 |
| Venue | Headingley, Leeds |
| Toss | Australia won the toss and fielded |
| Pakistan | 275/8 in 50 overs |
| Australia | 265 all out in 49.5 overs |
| Result | Pakistan won by 10 runs |
| Player of the Match | Inzamam-ul-Haq, 81 from 104 balls |
| Best bowling | Wasim Akram, 4/40 |
| Turning point | Australia fell from 214/4 to 251/8 |
| Tournament impact | Pakistan strengthened its Group B position; Australia slipped to a second defeat |
The ICC’s World Cup history of Headingley also identifies Inzamam and Razzaq’s recovery as the foundation of Pakistan’s victory.
Complete Match Scorecard
Pakistan Batting
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wajahatullah Wasti | c Steve Waugh b McGrath | 9 | 31 | 1 | 0 |
| Saeed Anwar | c Gilchrist b Reiffel | 25 | 23 | 5 | 0 |
| Abdul Razzaq | c Fleming b Warne | 60 | 99 | 3 | 1 |
| Ijaz Ahmed | lbw b Fleming | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Inzamam-ul-Haq | run out (Fleming) | 81 | 104 | 6 | 1 |
| Yousuf Youhana | run out (Warne/Lehmann) | 29 | 16 | 4 | 1 |
| Wasim Akram | c Gilchrist b Fleming | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Moin Khan | not out | 31 | 12 | 2 | 3 |
| Azhar Mahmood | run out (Martyn/McGrath) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Saqlain Mushtaq | not out | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shoaib Akhtar | did not bat | ||||
| Extras | 1 bye, 5 leg byes, 15 wides, 5 no-balls | 26 | |||
| Total | 8 wickets, 50 overs | 275 |
Fall of wickets: 32/1, 44/2, 46/3, 164/4, 216/5, 230/6, 262/7, 265/8.
Australia Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damien Fleming | 10 | 3 | 37 | 2 |
| Paul Reiffel | 10 | 1 | 49 | 1 |
| Glenn McGrath | 10 | 1 | 54 | 1 |
| Shane Warne | 10 | 0 | 50 | 1 |
| Steve Waugh | 6 | 0 | 37 | 0 |
| Damien Martyn | 2 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Darren Lehmann | 2 | 0 | 17 | 0 |
Australia Batting
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Gilchrist | b Wasim Akram | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Waugh | c Moin Khan b Razzaq | 41 | 49 | 6 | 0 |
| Ricky Ponting | c Saeed Anwar b Saqlain | 47 | 60 | 7 | 0 |
| Darren Lehmann | c Moin Khan b Saqlain | 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| Steve Waugh | b Shoaib Akhtar | 49 | 65 | 2 | 1 |
| Michael Bevan | c Ijaz Ahmed b Wasim Akram | 61 | 80 | 3 | 1 |
| Damien Martyn | b Wasim Akram | 18 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
| Shane Warne | run out (Ijaz Ahmed) | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Reiffel | c Wasim Akram b Saqlain | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Damien Fleming | not out | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Glenn McGrath | b Wasim Akram | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Extras | 7 byes, 10 leg byes, 14 wides, 7 no-balls | 38 | |||
| Total | All out, 49.5 overs | 265 |
Fall of wickets: 0/1, 91/2, 100/3, 101/4, 214/5, 238/6, 248/7, 251/8, 265/9, 265/10.
Pakistan Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasim Akram | 9.5 | 1 | 40 | 4 |
| Shoaib Akhtar | 10 | 0 | 46 | 1 |
| Azhar Mahmood | 10 | 0 | 61 | 0 |
| Saqlain Mushtaq | 10 | 1 | 51 | 3 |
| Abdul Razzaq | 10 | 0 | 50 | 1 |
Inzamam-ul-Haq Rebuilds Pakistan From 46/3
Pakistan’s innings threatened to unravel when Ijaz Ahmed’s dismissal left the score at 46/3. Australia had removed both openers and found enough movement to challenge every new batter.
Inzamam responded with patience rather than panic. He absorbed pressure, picked off loose deliveries and allowed Pakistan to rebuild without letting the required acceleration disappear from view.
His partnership with Razzaq added 118 for the fourth wicket. Inzamam eventually scored 81 from 104 balls, with six fours and a six. It was the highest score of the match and earned him the Player of the Match award.
He later described the 81 as his best World Cup score while reflecting on Pakistan’s 1999 campaign for the ICC.
Abdul Razzaq Gives Pakistan the Stability It Needed
Razzaq was only 19, yet he handled Australia’s experienced attack with striking maturity.
His 60 from 99 deliveries gave Inzamam a reliable partner during the innings’ most vulnerable phase. The scoring rate remained measured, but Pakistan could afford that restraint because both batters preserved wickets for the final assault.
Razzaq also removed Mark Waugh after Australia had recovered from Gilchrist’s first-over duck. That all-around contribution made him one of the match’s most valuable performers.
Moin Khan Changes the Value of Pakistan’s Total
Pakistan reached 230/6 with 22 deliveries remaining. A finish around 255 would have given Australia a far less demanding chase.
Moin Khan transformed the equation.
The wicketkeeper struck three sixes and two fours in an unbeaten 31 from 12 balls. Pakistan collected 45 from the final 22 deliveries, turning a respectable innings into a total capable of surviving Bevan’s expertise.
His late acceleration was the difference between making Australia uncomfortable and forcing them to chase aggressively until the final over.
Michael Bevan Brings Australia Back From 101/4
Australia’s reply began with Wasim bowling Gilchrist for a duck. Mark Waugh and Ponting repaired the damage, but Saqlain removed Ponting and Lehmann in the space of three deliveries.
At 101/4, Australia needed another recovery.
Steve Waugh and Bevan provided it through a 113-run fifth-wicket stand. Bevan controlled the required rate while Waugh worked through a demanding spell from Pakistan’s fast bowlers.
The partnership carried Australia to 214/4. With 62 required from 51 balls and six wickets available, the chase had tilted toward the batting side.
Wasim Akram and Saqlain Mushtaq Close the Door
Shoaib’s dismissal of Steve Waugh for 49 reopened the contest. Wasim then removed Bevan for 61, denying Australia the specialist finisher they wanted at the crease for the final overs.
Saqlain’s contribution was equally important. His 3/51 included Ponting, Lehmann and Reiffel, while Warne’s run-out intensified Australia’s late collapse.
Martyn took the chase to the final over, but Wasim retained control. Two wickets in three balls gave the Pakistan captain figures of 4/40 and completed the 10-run victory.
Pakistan and Australia Performance Analysis
Pakistan won because its players answered each setback with the right type of response. Inzamam and Razzaq repaired the top-order damage. Moin supplied the acceleration. Wasim and Saqlain then attacked when Australia’s chase entered its decisive phase.
Australia’s bowlers performed well early and Fleming conceded only 37 from his 10 overs. However, the fifth and sixth options proved expensive, while Moin’s closing assault added runs that became increasingly significant.
The batting effort contained three substantial partnerships, but Australia repeatedly lost wickets in clusters. The collapse from 214/4 to 251/8 left Martyn with too much responsibility and too little support.
Why Match 17 Belongs in the Celebration
A 10-run finish would already merit attention. The deeper value lies in how many times control changed hands.
Pakistan recovered from 46/3. Australia rebuilt from 101/4. Bevan and Waugh appeared to have positioned the chase for a composed finish before Pakistan’s attack struck again.
The result also created an intriguing contrast with the teams’ next meeting. Pakistan reached the Lord’s final, where Australia reversed the outcome emphatically to become world champion.
That wider journey connects Match 17 with Pakistan’s 1987 semifinal defeat to Australia, Inzamam’s breakthrough in the 1992 semifinal and Australia’s extraordinary 1999 semifinal escape.
Readers can also revisit Steve Waugh’s Headingley rescue against South Africa and Henry Olonga’s late intervention against India.
Every installment is available through the A Celebration of 5000 ODIs collection, alongside wider reporting and analysis in The Sports Encounter’s cricket coverage hub.
Final Takeaway
Headingley offered an early look at two teams whose paths would converge again at Lord’s. On this afternoon, Pakistan possessed the stronger middle-order recovery, the more destructive late surge and the bowlers capable of surviving Bevan’s challenge.
Inzamam built the victory. Moin enlarged it. Wasim finished it.
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs Match 16: Olonga Takes Three Wickets as India Fall Three Runs Short
India needed nine runs from two overs with three wickets remaining. Henry Olonga then delivered six balls that transformed Zimbabwe’s World Cup campaign.
India needed nine runs from 12 balls. Robin Singh had survived the repair work, Javagal Srinath had already struck two sixes, and Zimbabwe were turning to a bowler who had struggled to control the ball earlier in the chase.
Henry Olonga had conceded six wides across three overs. His return for the 45th carried obvious risk. India held three wickets and still had another over available.
Six deliveries later, the match was over.
Olonga removed Robin, bowled Srinath and trapped Venkatesh Prasad lbw. India were dismissed for 249, three runs short of Zimbabwe’s 252/9, with six balls of their reduced allocation unused.
The ending alone earns this contest a place in A Celebration of 5000 ODIs. The path toward it adds several more reasons: 90 overs of fluctuating control, 90 extras, India’s costly slow-over-rate penalty, the absence of Sachin Tendulkar, and a match-winning performance from Grant Flower that extended far beyond the final score.
TL;DR
- Zimbabwe beat India by three runs at Grace Road during the 1999 World Cup.
- Andy Flower anchored Zimbabwe’s innings with 68 not out from 85 balls.
- Grant Flower made 45 and conceded only 33 runs from 10 overs to earn Player of the Match.
- India’s slow over rate reduced its chase from 50 overs to 46.
- Sadagoppan Ramesh top-scored for India with 55, while Ajay Jadeja made 43.
- Henry Olonga took three wickets in the 45th over to end India’s chase at 249.
Zimbabwe vs India 1999 World Cup: Match Information
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | India vs Zimbabwe, Group A |
| Tournament | 1999 Cricket World Cup |
| Date | May 19, 1999 |
| Venue | Grace Road, Leicester |
| Toss | India won the toss and fielded |
| Zimbabwe | 252/9 in 50 overs |
| India | 249 all out in 45 overs |
| Result | Zimbabwe won by three runs |
| Player of the Match | Grant Flower, 45 and 1/33 |
| Zimbabwe’s top scorer | Andy Flower, 68 not out |
| India’s top scorer | Sadagoppan Ramesh, 55 |
| Best bowling figures | Heath Streak, 3/36; Henry Olonga, 3/22 |
| Turning point | Olonga took three wickets in the 45th over |
| Tournament impact | Zimbabwe earned its second win; India suffered a second consecutive defeat |
Complete Match Scorecard
Zimbabwe Innings: 252/9 in 50 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Johnson | c Mongia b Srinath | 7 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Grant Flower | c Mongia b Jadeja | 45 | 89 | 4 | 0 |
| Paul Strang | b Agarkar | 18 | 26 | 1 | 0 |
| Murray Goodwin | c Robin Singh b Ganguly | 17 | 40 | 3 | 0 |
| Andy Flower | Not out | 68 | 85 | 2 | 0 |
| Alistair Campbell | st Mongia b Kumble | 24 | 29 | 3 | 0 |
| Guy Whittall | b Kumble | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Stuart Carlisle | b Srinath | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Heath Streak | c Mongia b Prasad | 14 | 18 | 2 | 0 |
| Eddo Brandes | c Mongia b Prasad | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Henry Olonga | Not out | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Extras | 14 leg byes, 21 wides, 16 no-balls | 51 | |||
| Total | Nine wickets in 50 overs | 252 |
Fall of wickets: 12/1, 45/2, 87/3, 144/4, 204/5, 211/6, 214/7, 244/8, 250/9.
India Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javagal Srinath | 10 | 1 | 35 | 2 |
| Venkatesh Prasad | 10 | 1 | 37 | 2 |
| Ajit Agarkar | 9 | 0 | 70 | 1 |
| Sourav Ganguly | 5 | 0 | 22 | 1 |
| Robin Singh | 2 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Anil Kumble | 10 | 0 | 41 | 2 |
| Ajay Jadeja | 4 | 0 | 22 | 1 |
India Innings: 249 All Out in 45 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sourav Ganguly | c Brandes b Johnson | 9 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Sadagoppan Ramesh | c Goodwin b Grant Flower | 55 | 77 | 3 | 1 |
| Rahul Dravid | c Grant Flower b Streak | 13 | 14 | 2 | 0 |
| Mohammad Azharuddin | c Campbell b Streak | 7 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| Ajay Jadeja | lbw b Streak | 43 | 76 | 3 | 0 |
| Robin Singh | c Campbell b Olonga | 35 | 47 | 1 | 0 |
| Ajit Agarkar | Run out (Goodwin) | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Nayan Mongia | b Whittall | 28 | 24 | 2 | 1 |
| Javagal Srinath | b Olonga | 18 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Anil Kumble | Not out | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Venkatesh Prasad | lbw b Olonga | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Extras | 1 bye, 4 leg byes, 24 wides, 10 no-balls | 39 | |||
| Total | All out in 45 overs | 249 |
Fall of wickets: 13/1, 44/2, 56/3, 155/4, 174/5, 175/6, 219/7, 246/8, 249/9, 249/10.
Zimbabwe Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddo Brandes | 3 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
| Neil Johnson | 7 | 0 | 51 | 1 |
| Heath Streak | 9 | 0 | 36 | 3 |
| Henry Olonga | 4 | 0 | 22 | 3 |
| Guy Whittall | 4 | 0 | 26 | 1 |
| Paul Strang | 8 | 0 | 49 | 0 |
| Grant Flower | 10 | 0 | 33 | 1 |
India’s 51 Extras Change the Shape of the Match
Zimbabwe’s recognized batters scored only 200 runs between them. India supplied the remaining 51 through 21 wides, 16 no-balls and 14 leg byes.
Ajit Agarkar conceded 70 from nine overs, including five no-balls and four wides. Srinath bowled five no-balls, while almost every frontline option contributed to the extras column.
Those mistakes also slowed the innings. Match officials penalized India four overs for its slow over rate, leaving the team 46 overs to chase 253. In a match decided by three runs, the missing 24 deliveries became impossible to ignore.
Andy Flower Holds Zimbabwe Together
Zimbabwe reached 87/3 before Andy Flower began building the innings around control and placement.
Grant Flower’s 45 had occupied India’s bowlers for 89 deliveries, but his dismissal left Zimbabwe 144/4. Andy then added 60 with captain Alistair Campbell, who contributed 24 from 29 balls.
Three wickets fell for 10 runs after Campbell departed. Andy stayed unbeaten, pushed the total beyond 250 and finished with 68 from 85 balls.
His innings continued a remarkable family contribution to Zimbabwe cricket. The ICC’s history of Zimbabwe’s cricketing brothers identifies the Flower siblings as central figures in the country’s strongest World Cup campaign.
Grant Flower Delivers the Complete Match
Grant’s 45 was slower than Andy’s unbeaten innings, but it gave Zimbabwe stability after Neil Johnson and Paul Strang fell inside the first 10 overs.
His greater influence emerged during India’s chase.
Ramesh and Jadeja had rebuilt from 56/3 with a 99-run fourth-wicket partnership. Grant ended it by dismissing Ramesh for 55, then completed his 10 overs for only 33 runs.
That economy mattered in a chase requiring more than five runs per over. His combined batting and bowling contribution earned him Player of the Match, even though Olonga produced the unforgettable finish.
Heath Streak Breaks India’s Top Order
India played without Sachin Tendulkar, who had returned home following his father’s death. His absence placed greater pressure on Ganguly, Dravid and captain Azharuddin.
All three were gone by the ninth over.
Neil Johnson dismissed Ganguly before Heath Streak removed Dravid and Azharuddin. Streak later trapped Jadeja lbw for 43, finishing with 3/36 from nine overs.
India had recovered from 56/3 to 155/3, but Streak’s third wicket prevented Jadeja from carrying the chase into its closing phase.
Tendulkar returned in India’s next game and scored an emotional unbeaten 140 against Kenya, an innings documented in the ICC’s account of his finest World Cup performances.
Ramesh, Robin and Srinath Take India Within Reach
Ramesh’s 55 gave India its first substantial innings. Jadeja supported him with 43, but their dismissals and Agarkar’s run-out left India 175/6.
Robin Singh then rebuilt with Mongia. After Mongia fell for 28, Srinath attacked, striking two sixes in his 12-ball 18.
India moved to 246/7 and needed seven runs from 10 deliveries. Zimbabwe appeared to have lost control despite repeatedly creating winning positions.
Campbell brought Olonga back.
Henry Olonga Wins the Match in Five Balls
Olonga’s second delivery removed Robin for 35, with Campbell completing the catch.
Srinath survived two more balls before Olonga bowled him with the fifth delivery. Prasad faced the last ball and was trapped lbw for a duck.
Olonga had taken three wickets in five balls. His final figures read 3/22 from four overs, an extraordinary return considering the six wides he had delivered earlier.
The ICC ranks Zimbabwe’s victory among the greatest World Cup upsets, while its review of Zimbabwe’s classic World Cup matches highlights Olonga’s ability to recover from his earlier problems and attack India’s final three wickets.
Why Match 16 Belongs in A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
This match asked both teams to recover repeatedly.
Zimbabwe survived early wickets, India’s middle order rebuilt from 56/3, and Robin and Srinath brought the chase back after it slipped to 175/6. Olonga then turned a likely defeat into victory within one over.
The three-run margin connects the game with Zimbabwe’s earlier World Cup surprises, including Eddo Brandes defending 134 against England in Match 10. It also provides a very different counterpoint to Kapil Dev’s rescue against Zimbabwe in 1983.
The contest followed the two Australia-South Africa classics from the same tournament: Steve Waugh’s survival at Headingley and the tied semifinal at Edgbaston.
Readers can explore every published installment through the A Celebration of 5000 ODIs collection and follow wider historical and current reporting through The Sports Encounter’s cricket coverage hub.
What Happened Next
Zimbabwe later defeated South Africa and reached the Super Six stage for the first time. India recovered to win its next three group matches, but the points carried forward from this defeat damaged its position in the following round.
Grace Road produced the result through accumulated mistakes and small interventions rather than a dominant century or five-wicket haul. India conceded 51 extras, lost four overs and still reached the final nine runs with three wickets available.
Olonga needed one over to make every earlier detail decisive.
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
A Celebration of 5000 ODIs Match 15: One Run, Two Stranded Batters and South Africa’s World Cup Collapse
Lance Klusener carried South Africa within one run of the 1999 World Cup final before confusion with Allan Donald completed cricket’s most painful tie.
Lance Klusener had already struck the first two balls of the final over for four. The scores were level, South Africa had four deliveries left, and Australia appeared to have exhausted every escape route.
Then time seemed to slow down at Edgbaston.
Klusener drove Damien Fleming’s fourth delivery toward mid-off and ran. Allan Donald remained at the non-striker’s end, watching the ball instead of his partner. By the time Donald reacted, Klusener had reached the same end and Australia had transferred the ball to Adam Gilchrist.
The wicketkeeper broke the stumps. Donald dropped his bat. South Africa’s World Cup ended with both batters stranded at the wrong end and one winning run still unclaimed.
Australia and South Africa had scored 213 each, but the tie sent Australia into the final because they had finished higher in the Super Six standings. That combination of pressure, confusion and irreversible consequence makes the 1999 semifinal an essential part of A Celebration of 5000 ODIs.
TL;DR
- Australia and South Africa tied after both teams were dismissed for 213.
- Australia advanced to the World Cup final because they finished higher in the Super Six table.
- Michael Bevan scored 65 and Steve Waugh made 56 after Australia slipped to 68/4.
- Shaun Pollock took 5/36, while Allan Donald claimed 4/32.
- Shane Warne earned Player of the Match honors after taking 4/29.
- Lance Klusener struck 31 not out from 16 balls before Allan Donald was run out with the scores level.
Australia vs South Africa 1999 Semifinal: Match Information
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Match | Australia vs South Africa, second semifinal |
| Tournament | 1999 Cricket World Cup |
| Date | June 17, 1999 |
| Venue | Edgbaston, Birmingham |
| Toss | South Africa won the toss and fielded |
| Australia | 213 all out in 49.2 overs |
| South Africa | 213 all out in 49.4 overs |
| Result | Match tied; Australia advanced |
| Player of the Match | Shane Warne, 4/29 |
| Top Australia batter | Michael Bevan, 65 |
| Top South Africa batter | Jacques Kallis, 53 |
| Best bowling figures | Shaun Pollock, 5/36 |
| Turning point | Klusener and Donald’s run-out with the scores level |
| Tournament impact | Australia advanced to face Pakistan in the final |
The official ICC review of the 1999 World Cup confirms that Australia progressed because of its higher Super Six position.
Complete Match Scorecard
Australia Innings: 213 All Out in 49.2 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Gilchrist | c Donald b Kallis | 20 | 39 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Waugh | c Boucher b Pollock | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Ricky Ponting | c Kirsten b Donald | 37 | 48 | 3 | 1 |
| Darren Lehmann | c Boucher b Donald | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Waugh | c Boucher b Pollock | 56 | 76 | 6 | 1 |
| Michael Bevan | c Boucher b Pollock | 65 | 101 | 6 | 0 |
| Tom Moody | lbw b Pollock | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Shane Warne | c Cronje b Pollock | 18 | 24 | 1 | 0 |
| Paul Reiffel | b Donald | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Damien Fleming | b Donald | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Glenn McGrath | Not out | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Extras | 1 bye, 6 leg byes, 3 wides, 6 no-balls | 16 | |||
| Total | All out in 49.2 overs | 213 |
Fall of wickets: 3/1, 54/2, 58/3, 68/4, 158/5, 158/6, 207/7, 207/8, 207/9, 213/10.
South Africa Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shaun Pollock | 9.2 | 1 | 36 | 5 |
| Steve Elworthy | 10 | 0 | 59 | 0 |
| Jacques Kallis | 10 | 2 | 27 | 1 |
| Allan Donald | 10 | 1 | 32 | 4 |
| Lance Klusener | 9 | 1 | 50 | 0 |
| Hansie Cronje | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
South Africa Innings: 213 All Out in 49.4 Overs
| Batter | Dismissal | Runs | Balls | 4s | 6s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Kirsten | b Warne | 18 | 42 | 1 | 0 |
| Herschelle Gibbs | b Warne | 30 | 36 | 6 | 0 |
| Daryll Cullinan | Run out (Bevan) | 6 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Hansie Cronje | c Mark Waugh b Warne | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Jacques Kallis | c Steve Waugh b Warne | 53 | 92 | 3 | 0 |
| Jonty Rhodes | c Bevan b Reiffel | 43 | 55 | 2 | 1 |
| Shaun Pollock | b Fleming | 20 | 14 | 1 | 1 |
| Lance Klusener | Not out | 31 | 16 | 4 | 1 |
| Mark Boucher | b McGrath | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Elworthy | Run out (Reiffel/McGrath) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Allan Donald | Run out (Mark Waugh/Fleming/Gilchrist) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Extras | 1 leg bye, 5 wides | 6 | |||
| Total | All out in 49.4 overs | 213 |
Fall of wickets: 48/1, 53/2, 53/3, 61/4, 145/5, 175/6, 183/7, 196/8, 198/9, 213/10.
Australia Bowling
| Bowler | Overs | Maidens | Runs | Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn McGrath | 10 | 0 | 51 | 1 |
| Damien Fleming | 8.4 | 1 | 40 | 1 |
| Paul Reiffel | 8 | 0 | 28 | 1 |
| Shane Warne | 10 | 4 | 29 | 4 |
| Mark Waugh | 8 | 0 | 37 | 0 |
| Tom Moody | 5 | 0 | 27 | 0 |
The figures and dismissals have been checked against the archived ESPNcricinfo scorecard.
Michael Bevan and Steve Waugh Rescue Australia
South Africa’s attack created the first crisis of the semifinal.
Mark Waugh fell for a duck, while Donald removed Ricky Ponting and Darren Lehmann. Kallis dismissed Gilchrist to leave Australia 68/4.
Steve Waugh and Michael Bevan responded with a 90-run partnership. Their approach suited the conditions: cautious against Donald and Pollock, selective against the supporting bowlers, and willing to preserve wickets while rebuilding the innings.
Waugh made 56 from 76 balls before Pollock removed him. Bevan remained until the final delivery of the innings, scoring 65 from 101 balls. Those runs gave Warne and Australia’s seamers a total they could defend.
The innings continued Australia’s survival story from Match 14, when Waugh’s unbeaten 120 kept their World Cup alive against South Africa.
Shaun Pollock and Allan Donald Take Nine Wickets
Pollock and Donald gave South Africa almost complete control of Australia’s innings.
Pollock claimed 5/36, dismissing both Waugh and Bevan while also removing Mark Waugh, Moody and Warne. Donald’s pace brought him 4/32, including three wickets during Australia’s two major collapses.
Australia fell from 158/4 to 158/6 and later from 207/6 to 207/9. South Africa’s bowlers had done enough to make 214 appear manageable, but their batters would face an equally influential spell.
Shane Warne Changes the Semifinal in Eight Deliveries
South Africa reached 48 without loss. Gibbs had struck six boundaries and appeared ready to continue the form that brought him a century against Australia four days earlier.
Warne bowled him for 30.
Eight deliveries later, South Africa were 53/3. Warne had also bowled Kirsten and removed Cronje for a duck. The chase that had begun with confidence suddenly required reconstruction.
Warne later dismissed Kallis for 53, completing figures of 4/29 with four maidens. His ability to attack while suppressing runs earned him Player of the Match and recalled his earlier knockout intervention in Australia’s 1996 semifinal escape against West Indies.
Jacques Kallis and Jonty Rhodes Rebuild the Chase
Kallis absorbed the pressure created by Warne and gradually repaired South Africa’s innings. Jonty Rhodes then brought urgency, making 43 from 55 balls during an 84-run fifth-wicket partnership.
Their stand lifted South Africa from 61/4 to 145/4.
Reiffel removed Rhodes before Warne claimed Kallis. Pollock’s 20 from 14 balls kept the chase moving, but another series of wickets left South Africa at 198/9.
Only Klusener and Donald remained.
Lance Klusener Brings South Africa to the Brink
Klusener had dominated the tournament’s closing overs and approached the semifinal with the same aggression.
He struck 31 from 16 balls, including four fours and a six. South Africa needed nine from Fleming’s final over. Klusener hammered the first two deliveries through the field, leveling the scores immediately.
The third ball produced no run and nearly caused a run-out when Donald wandered from his crease. Australia missed that chance.
On the fourth, Klusener drove toward mid-off and committed to the single. Donald did not respond until it was too late. The ICC’s reconstruction of the final over preserves the chaos that followed.
Why Match 15 Belongs in A Celebration of 5000 ODIs
The final run-out remains unforgettable, but the match deserves inclusion for much more than its last four deliveries.
Both teams recovered from four-wicket collapses. South Africa’s two leading fast bowlers shared nine wickets. Bevan and Waugh constructed a partnership under elimination pressure. Warne overturned a stable chase, Kallis repaired it, and Klusener nearly finished it.
The semifinal also deepened South Africa’s painful World Cup history. Rain had destroyed their opportunity in the 1992 semifinal against England, while Brian Lara ended their unbeaten 1996 campaign.
Readers can follow the complete sequence through the dedicated A Celebration of 5000 ODIs collection or explore current matches and historical analysis through The Sports Encounter’s cricket coverage hub.
What Happened Next
Australia faced Pakistan at Lord’s three days later. Warne took another four wickets as Pakistan were dismissed for 132, and Australia won by eight wickets to claim its second men’s World Cup title.
South Africa left Edgbaston without technically losing the semifinal. Ninety-nine overs had failed to separate the teams, yet a previous defeat to Australia determined who advanced.
That is the cruelty at the center of Match 15. South Africa reached the same score, stood one run from the final and still went home.
-
Editor's Choice4 weeks agoWhich of Last Season’s Premier League Top 10 Can Actually Win the 2026-27 Title?
-
CPL 20264 days agoCan TKR Still Qualify for the 2026 Playoffs? Qualification Scenarios Explained
-
Editor's Choice4 weeks agoWhat ASEAN Championship History Tells Us About the 2026 Semifinalists
