The NHL’s richest annual contract now belongs to a 21-year-old center who has played only three regular seasons.

That sentence alone explains why the Anaheim Ducks’ decision to match the Philadelphia Flyers’ offer sheet is more than a team transaction. It is a league-wide reset.

The player is Leo Carlsson, the Swedish center Anaheim selected No. 2 overall in the 2023 NHL Draft. The deal is a five-year, $90 million contract with an average annual value of $18 million, making Carlsson the highest-paid player in NHL history on a per-season basis. For readers following The Sports Encounter’s wider NHL coverage, this is one of the most aggressive contract moments the league has seen in years.

The Ducks had a choice. They could match the offer sheet and keep their franchise center at a massive price, or they could let him go to Philadelphia and receive four first-round draft picks as compensation. Anaheim chose certainty over draft capital. In doing so, the Ducks kept the player they believe can define their next era.

The Contract That Forced Anaheim’s Hand

Philadelphia’s offer sheet was designed to create pressure.

A five-year term kept the deal short enough to return Carlsson to unrestricted free agency in 2031, while the $18 million annual value placed him above every player in the league on a per-season basis. According to the official NHL report on Carlsson’s offer sheet, the contract was worth $90 million over five years and would have required four first-round picks as compensation if Anaheim did not match.

That structure made the decision uncomfortable. Four first-round picks are not small compensation. In a rebuild, they can shape half a decade of roster construction. But Carlsson is not a normal restricted free agent. He is a young top-line center, a premium position player, and already one of the most important pieces in Anaheim’s rebuild.

For the Ducks, the question was never only about money. It was about identity.

Do you let a franchise center leave because the price is uncomfortable, or do you pay the price because players like this rarely become available?

Anaheim gave its answer.

Why the Ducks Could Not Let Him Walk

Carlsson’s rise explains the match.

Last season, he posted career highs with 29 goals, 38 assists, and 67 points in 70 regular-season games. He also added 11 points in 12 playoff games as Anaheim pushed deeper into the postseason picture. Across his first 201 regular-season games, he has produced 141 points, including 61 goals and 80 assists.

Those numbers matter, but they do not tell the whole story.

At 6-foot-3 and over 200 pounds, Carlsson gives Anaheim size down the middle. He can handle matchups, create offense, and grow into the kind of two-way center who changes how a team is built. Elite centers are hockey’s structural pieces. Wingers can score. Defensemen can tilt the ice. Goalies can steal nights. But a true No. 1 center gives a franchise its spine.

That is why the Ducks’ front office viewed him as non-negotiable.

General manager Pat Verbeek said Anaheim had viewed Carlsson as a franchise player since meeting him before the 2023 draft. Ducks owners Henry and Susan Samueli also made clear that the team had planned its cap space with the ability to keep him. That language matters because it frames the deal as a long-term bet, not a panic reaction.

Philadelphia Lost the Player but Still Changed the Market

The Flyers did not get Carlsson, but they still shook the NHL.

Offer sheets remain rare because they are aggressive by nature. They test another team’s cap structure, force public decisions, and sometimes strain relationships between front offices. Philadelphia knew Anaheim had the right to match. That was the point. The Flyers made the Ducks pay a historic price to keep their own player.

That strategy may not deliver Carlsson to Philadelphia, but it sends a message to the rest of the league. Young restricted free agents now have a new reference point. Agents will look at this deal when negotiating for other emerging stars. General managers will look at their cap tables differently. Teams with unsigned young centers and franchise forwards will know that another club may not wait politely for negotiations to finish.

This is why the contract matters beyond Anaheim. It pushes the restricted free-agent market into a more dangerous place for teams that delay business with cornerstone players.

Highest Paid Does Not Mean Safest Bet

Carlsson is now the NHL’s highest-paid player per season, but that does not mean the deal is risk-free.

Anaheim is paying for what he is and what it believes he will become. At 21, he has already shown top-line production, playoff impact, and franchise-player traits. Still, $18 million per season creates pressure. Every cold stretch will be discussed. Every comparison with other elite centers will follow him. Every playoff failure will make the number louder.

The Ducks are betting that his prime years will justify the price.

That is not an unreasonable bet. Carlsson’s age gives Anaheim upside. This is not a late-career contract for past achievement. It is a front-loaded belief in future value. If he becomes one of the league’s truly elite centers, the deal could age better than it looks today, especially if the salary cap continues to rise.

The risk is that the contract immediately changes the standard by which Carlsson is judged. He is no longer only a promising young center. He is the NHL’s highest-paid player per season.

What This Means for Anaheim’s Rebuild

The Ducks have now made their clearest statement yet about the direction of the franchise.

This team is no longer only collecting prospects and waiting for the future. Anaheim has committed superstar-level money to the player it believes can carry that future. The next step is harder: building a serious contender around him.

That means drafting well, developing young talent, managing cap space, and avoiding the trap of paying too much around one centerpiece. Carlsson can be the foundation, but he cannot be the whole structure.

For context, The Sports Encounter has already tracked several major NHL roster and ownership moves this offseason, including major NHL updates, Pittsburgh’s ownership change, and Florida’s Stanley Cup favorite push after the Brady Tkachuk blockbuster. Carlsson’s contract belongs in that same offseason conversation because it changes competitive planning, not just payroll.

Anaheim now has its center. The challenge is turning that center into a championship timeline.

Why the No-Trade Restriction Matters

Because Anaheim matched the offer sheet, Carlsson cannot be traded for at least one year.

That detail protects the spirit of the offer-sheet system. A team cannot simply match the contract and immediately flip the player elsewhere. The Ducks are now committed to keeping him and absorbing the cap impact, at least in the short term.

That also gives Carlsson stability. He wanted Anaheim to match, and now he gets the security of a massive contract while remaining with the team that drafted him. His comments made that clear. The offer was enormous, but he still wanted to stay a Duck.

For a young player, that matters. Money changes expectations, but comfort and role can shape performance. Carlsson knows Anaheim’s room, market, coaching environment, and organizational direction. Now he has to grow from franchise cornerstone into franchise driver.

Key Facts

The Bigger Contract Lesson

This deal will not stay isolated.

Every major young player negotiation now has a new ceiling to discuss. Carlsson’s contract gives agents a stronger argument for elite restricted free agents. It also gives aggressive teams a blueprint. If a rival club has a franchise player unsigned and limited cap room, an offer sheet can become a weapon.

That does not mean the NHL will suddenly become an offer-sheet league. Front offices still move carefully. Draft-pick compensation is expensive, and relationships matter. But Philadelphia proved that the tactic can create pressure even when it fails to land the player.

The Flyers forced Anaheim into a historic contract. That alone makes the move successful in a disruptive sense.

FAQs

Who became the highest-paid NHL player per season?

Leo Carlsson became the NHL’s highest-paid player per season after the Anaheim Ducks matched the Philadelphia Flyers’ five-year, $90 million offer sheet.

How much is Leo Carlsson’s new contract worth?

The contract is worth $90 million over five years, with an average annual value of $18 million.

Why did the Ducks match the offer sheet?

Anaheim matched because Carlsson is viewed as a franchise center and one of the core players in the Ducks’ long-term rebuild.

What would the Flyers have paid in compensation?

If Anaheim had not matched, Philadelphia would have owed the Ducks four first-round draft picks.

Can Anaheim trade Leo Carlsson now?

No. Because Anaheim matched the offer sheet, Carlsson cannot be traded for at least one year.

Final Word

The NHL’s richest annual signing is not only about Leo Carlsson getting paid.

It is about a young star becoming the center of a franchise’s future, a rival team forcing a historic decision, and a contract market that now has a new number everyone will remember.

Anaheim kept its player. Philadelphia made its point. Carlsson got the deal of a lifetime and the responsibility that comes with it.

Now the hockey part begins.

For the Ducks, this contract will be judged by more than goals and assists. It will be judged by whether Carlsson becomes the elite center Anaheim believes it just paid for.

The question around Spain has changed.

Earlier in the FIFA World Cup 2026, it was about whether La Roja had enough edge to survive the knockout pressure. Now, after eliminating Portugal with a stoppage-time winner, the question is sharper: can Spain turn control into a semifinal place against a Belgium side that suddenly looks dangerous again?

This second quarterfinal at Los Angeles Stadium brings two very different forms of momentum. Spain arrive with structure, patience, pressing discipline, and the confidence of a team that has learned how to win tight games. Belgium arrive with release, attacking belief, and the emotional lift of a 4-1 Round of 16 statement against the United States.

For full tournament coverage, follow The Sports Encounter’s FIFA World Cup 2026 hub.

TL;DR

• Spain face Belgium in the FIFA World Cup 2026 quarterfinal at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10.
• Spain reached this stage after beating Portugal 1-0 through a late Mikel Merino goal.
• Belgium stormed past the United States 4-1 in the Round of 16, with Charles De Ketelaere producing a breakout knockout display.
• Spain appear in better overall shape because of their balance, unbeaten rhythm, and defensive control.
• Belgium have momentum too, but their defense must solve the biggest question of the match: how to contain Lamine Yamal.
• The winner moves into the semifinal and stays alive in a tournament where Europe’s heavyweights have begun to separate themselves.

Key Information Box

Spain Arrive With Control, But Also a New Kind of Edge

Spain have carried one of the cleanest tournament profiles into the quarterfinals.

They have not always overwhelmed opponents with chaos or constant goal rushes. Their strength has been more measured: ball control, positional discipline, technical security, and a midfield that can suffocate rhythm before the opposition finds comfort.

The 3-0 win over Austria in the Round of 32 showed Spain’s sharper side. Mikel Oyarzabal scored twice, Pedro Porro added another, and Lamine Yamal stretched Austria’s defensive shape with his movement and timing. That performance, covered in The Sports Encounter’s report on Spain’s commanding Austria win, gave La Roja the attacking authority they needed after earlier questions about whether they could turn possession into punishment.

Then came Portugal.

Spain’s 1-0 Round of 16 win was a different type of proof. They did not need a perfect attacking display. They needed patience, control, nerve, and a late killer moment. Mikel Merino’s stoppage-time winner ended Portugal’s World Cup and likely closed Cristiano Ronaldo’s World Cup story. More importantly for Spain, it confirmed that this team can win a knockout match when the rhythm becomes uncomfortable.

That is why Spain come into this quarterfinal in better overall shape. They have control when the game is open, discipline when the game is tight, and enough bench depth to change the mood late. Their tournament has built layer by layer.

Read more on that emotional knockout night in The Sports Encounter’s report: Spain End Ronaldo’s World Cup Dream With Brutal Late Winner.

Belgium’s Tournament Has Been Messier, But the Belief Is Back

Belgium’s path has been less smooth.

Their group-stage campaign had warning signs. Draws against Egypt and Iran raised questions about tempo, creativity, and whether this version of Belgium still had enough sharpness to go deep. The 5-1 win over New Zealand helped reset the mood, but it did not fully erase the feeling that Belgium were still searching for their best version.

The Round of 16 changed that conversation.

Belgium’s 4-1 win over the United States was their most convincing performance of the tournament. Charles De Ketelaere delivered the kind of display that can change how opponents prepare. His brace gave Belgium a younger attacking reference point beyond the familiar names, while Thibaut Courtois, Kevin De Bruyne, and Romelu Lukaku still give the squad high-level experience around pressure moments.

The win also carried political and emotional noise after the buildup around Folarin Balogun’s availability, which The Sports Encounter covered in its analysis of USA vs Belgium becoming a major World Cup rules debate. Belgium handled that distraction well. Once the match started, they looked sharper, stronger, and far more ruthless than they had earlier in the tournament.

Their 4-1 win also ended the host nation’s run and gave Belgium genuine momentum before facing Spain. The Sports Encounter’s match report on USA’s World Cup dream ending against Belgium remains the key internal reference for that performance.

Which Team Is in Better Shape?

Spain are in better shape overall.

That does not make this match simple. Belgium have the individual quality to hurt any team left in the competition. Courtois can keep them alive. De Bruyne can still find passes that bypass structure. Lukaku can create physical problems late. De Ketelaere now gives Belgium a forward runner with confidence and form.

Still, Spain look more complete.

Their midfield has more control. Their defensive structure has been more reliable. Their wide threat is more consistent. Their unbeaten rhythm under Luis de la Fuente gives them the feel of a team that trusts its own mechanisms rather than waiting for individual rescue acts.

Belgium’s momentum is real, but Spain’s momentum feels more stable.

There is also one selection concern for Belgium. Amadou Onana’s injury removes a major midfield presence, which matters against a Spain side that wants to dominate central zones and force opponents to defend for long spells. Without him, Belgium may need extra defensive discipline from their midfield line and cleaner decision-making when they recover the ball.

Lamine Yamal vs Belgium’s Defense Could Decide the Match

Belgium’s defensive plan begins with Lamine Yamal.

Yamal has already become one of the defining young faces of this World Cup. His threat is not only about dribbling. He changes the geometry of Spain’s attack. When he receives wide, defenders hesitate. When he comes inside, midfielders are forced to decide whether to step out or protect the half-space. That hesitation creates Spain’s rhythm.

Belgium cannot defend him with one player alone.

If the fullback jumps too early, Yamal can slip passes inside or attack the outside shoulder. If Belgium double him too aggressively, Spain can switch play and find space on the far side. If they sit too deep, Spain can keep recycling possession until Rodri and the midfield begin to dictate every angle.

Belgium’s best answer may be controlled aggression. They need to reduce Yamal’s first touch comfort, block his inside passing lanes, and make him defend as much as possible by attacking Spain’s right side when possession turns over.

That is easier to say than to execute.

Yamal’s biggest weapon is calm. He rarely looks rushed. Belgium must avoid the mistake of turning this into a personal duel driven by emotion. The smarter plan is collective: pressure the passer, cover the inside lane, delay the dribble, and avoid cheap fouls near the box.

Spain’s Midfield Control vs Belgium’s Vertical Threat

Spain will likely try to make the match feel slow before making it suddenly fast.

That pattern suits them. Rodri’s presence gives Spain control over second balls and tempo. Pedri, Gavi, Merino, or whichever midfield combination de la Fuente chooses can keep Belgium moving side to side. The aim will be to tire Belgium’s midfield line, pull defenders out of shape, and let Yamal or Nico Williams attack when the space appears.

Belgium will want the opposite.

They need the game to open in moments. Their best chance may come from transitions, quick vertical passes, and early service before Spain’s rest defense settles. De Ketelaere’s confidence after the USA match makes him important here. He can run into gaps, receive between lines, and force Spain’s center backs to make decisions facing their own goal.

De Bruyne’s role could be decisive, even if he is managed carefully. If he gets time to lift his head, Belgium can turn one recovery into a scoring chance. Spain will know that. Cutting off his first forward option may be as important as pressing him directly.

Head-to-Head: Spain Hold the Historical Edge

Spain and Belgium have met 22 times in senior men’s international football.

Spain lead the head-to-head record with 12 wins, while Belgium have won five. Five matches have ended in draws. That history gives Spain the statistical edge, but knockout football rarely follows old records cleanly.

The more relevant pattern is recent competitive identity.

Spain have rebuilt themselves into a cohesive tournament team. Belgium, after years of carrying the “golden generation” label, now look like a side trying to blend old leadership with newer attacking energy. This quarterfinal will test whether Belgium’s reboot has enough substance to survive against one of the most structured teams in the tournament.

Tactical Keys to the Match

What Spain Must Avoid

Spain must avoid turning control into comfort.

That has been a familiar danger for possession-heavy teams at World Cups. They can dominate the ball, push the opponent back, and still leave themselves exposed to one transition. Belgium have enough quality to punish that.

La Roja also need patience with purpose. Passing for control is useful only if it moves Belgium’s defensive block. If Spain become too slow, Belgium will settle into a compact shape and wait for counters.

The best version of Spain moves the ball quickly enough to shift the opponent, then accelerates through Yamal, Williams, Oyarzabal, or late midfield runners. That version can make Belgium defend too many zones at once.

What Belgium Must Do to Upset Spain

Belgium need courage, but reckless pressing would be dangerous.

They should pick pressing moments carefully, especially after backward passes or heavy touches. Spain are too comfortable technically to be chased blindly. Belgium must also protect the central spaces in front of their back line because that is where Spain can turn possession into control and control into chances.

Courtois will matter. His experience in Spanish football gives him insight into many of Spain’s players, but this match will still demand concentration for long stretches. Against Spain, goalkeepers can go quiet for 20 minutes and then suddenly face a decisive chance.

Belgium’s attacking players must also be efficient. They may not get many clear openings. When De Ketelaere, Lukaku, or De Bruyne see one, they have to make Spain feel the risk of pushing high.

Prediction: Spain Have the Edge, But Belgium Have the Punch

Spain should enter the FIFA World Cup 2026 quarterfinal as favorites.

They have the stronger tournament body of work, the cleaner tactical identity, and the better balance between control and threat. Their late win over Portugal showed they can carry pressure without panic. Their earlier win over Austria showed they can open up a knockout opponent when the attack clicks.

Belgium, though, are dangerous because they arrive with their best performance behind them. A 4-1 win over the United States gave them belief, goals, and a new attacking headline through De Ketelaere. If they score first, this match could become uncomfortable for Spain very quickly.

Still, the safer read is Spain by a narrow margin.

They look more stable. They have more ways to control the game. And if Lamine Yamal finds enough space against Belgium’s defense, La Roja may have the one player who can tilt a tight quarterfinal before Belgium’s veterans get their chance to rescue it.

For more knockout-stage context, read The Sports Encounter’s Round of 16 preview and the latest Soccer coverage.

India needed a response. They gave England a record chase instead.

After the 125-run defeat at Trent Bridge had already exposed India’s confused T20I direction, Bristol made the damage feel deeper. India won the toss, chose to bat, reached only 158-7, and then watched England race to 159-1 in just 13.5 overs.

It was England’s fastest successful T20I chase with a target of 150 or more. It also sealed a 3-0 lead in the five-match series, giving England their first T20I series triumph over India in the format and leaving India with back-to-back T20I series defeats for the first time since 2018-19.

Harry Brook, leading England, demolished the Indian attack with an unbeaten 79 off 35 balls. Phil Salt continued his excellent series with another half-century, finishing 59 not out from 42 deliveries. Together, they added an unbeaten 146-run stand after Jos Buttler fell early.

For England, this was control, clarity, and confidence.

For India, it was another difficult night in a series that is quickly becoming a deeper audit of selection, batting maturity, and the team’s ability to handle overseas T20 conditions.

For more cricket coverage and match analysis, follow The Sports Encounter’s Cricket Hub.

England vs India 4th T20I: Match Summary

India’s Batting Fails Again Under Real Pace and Bounce

India’s total was built almost entirely around Shreyas Iyer.

The Indian captain played a fighting unbeaten 80 from 49 balls, striking four fours and five sixes. He gave India some respectability, especially after another weak start left the innings wobbling early. Without him, India’s scorecard would have looked far worse.

The problem was everything around him.

Vaibhav Sooryavanshi made 15 off 10. Abhishek Sharma scored 16 off 14. Ishan Kishan managed only 4. By 6.4 overs, India were 48-3, and the innings had already lost shape.

This was not simply a bad start. It was another reminder that India’s young top order is struggling to adjust when the ball moves, climbs, and forces better shot selection. In Indian conditions, short boundaries and flatter surfaces can sometimes protect loose batting. In England, the margin is smaller. The ball can swing. The bounce can rush batters. The square boundaries can turn hopeful strokes into catching practice.

That is where India looked underprepared again.

The approach from Vaibhav Sooryavanshi will now attract serious debate. He is young, gifted, and fearless, but fearlessness without control can become a liability at international level. India may believe they are investing in the future, but the question is whether this stage has come too early for him.

There is a difference between backing youth and exposing youth before the player has enough tools for hostile conditions.

Sanju Samson Question Returns After Another Top-Order Failure

The continued absence of Sanju Samson will only add more noise around India’s selection calls.

Samson was once again on the bench while India’s top order failed to give the innings any stability. The debate is bigger than one player now. It is about whether India are selecting for reputation, projection, or actual match requirements.

Samson brings experience, international exposure, wicketkeeping depth, and a more developed understanding of tempo. After another top-order failure, India’s decision to keep him out will be questioned by fans and analysts who believe the team needs maturity more than experimentation.

This is not about blaming one young opener or presenting Samson as a magical fix. It is about balance.

India’s T20I lineup currently looks talented, but fragile. Too many players appear to be batting in the same emotional gear. Too many shots look pre-decided. Too many collapses are being explained as part of a transition when they may actually be signs of poor role clarity.

India had already suffered a brutal collapse in the previous match, when England beat them by 125 runs at Trent Bridge. That result was covered in The Sports Encounter’s report on India’s worst T20I defeat by runs. Bristol did not bring the same numerical embarrassment, but it deepened the same cricketing concern.

Archer and Tongue Keep India Under Pressure

England’s bowling was disciplined without needing to be spectacular for all 20 overs.

Jofra Archer set the tone with 2-20 from four overs. He removed Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and later dismissed Washington Sundar, while also contributing to Axar Patel’s run out at the end of India’s innings.

Josh Tongue continued his strong series, taking 2-36. He dismissed Ishan Kishan and Tilak Varma, keeping India from building momentum around Shreyas Iyer.

Will Jacks also played an important holding role with 1-28 from four overs. Sam Curran went wicketless but gave away only 24 from his four overs, helping England squeeze India through the middle and late phases.

India’s 158 looked below par when the innings ended. It looked much smaller once England started batting.

Brook Breaks the Chase Open

England lost Jos Buttler for 8 at 13-1, but that was the only real moment India had.

Harry Brook came in and immediately changed the mood of the chase. His unbeaten 79 from 35 balls included eight fours and four sixes. It was not a captain’s knock in the old cautious sense. It was a captain taking the game away before India could even imagine pressure.

Brook’s hitting exposed India’s lack of control with the ball. Prince Yadav, Axar Patel, Washington Sundar, Shivam Dube, and Prasidh Krishna all struggled to contain England’s scoring rate. India did not build pressure from either end, and once Brook found rhythm, the chase became a procession.

England reached 62-1 in the power play. By the 10th over, the result was almost settled. Brook and Salt did not need risk management. They had enough time, enough wickets, and enough loose bowling to turn the chase into another statement.

This was England’s T20 cricket at its cleanest: aggressive without panic, ruthless without clutter.

Phil Salt Keeps Punishing India

Phil Salt’s 59 not out continued his excellent run in the series.

After scoring 70 in the previous T20I, Salt produced another controlled half-century. He was slightly quieter than Brook in Bristol, but that almost made the partnership more damaging for India. Brook attacked violently. Salt kept the chase moving, punished width, and ensured England never lost tempo.

Salt’s form has become one of the defining stories of the series. He has given England the kind of top-order certainty India currently lack. Where India are searching for the right balance, England look increasingly comfortable with their roles.

The contrast is uncomfortable for India.

Salt knows his job. Brook knows his job. England’s middle order has clarity behind them. India, at the moment, look like a team trying to force a future without enough present-day stability.

What This Defeat Says About India

This defeat should worry India for more than the result.

They were outplayed in skill, execution, and decision-making. Their batting lacked adaptability. Their bowling lacked discipline. Their selection continues to invite difficult questions.

The biggest concern is the repeated pattern. India’s openers are not giving starts. The middle order is repeatedly walking in under pressure. Shreyas Iyer’s 80* was valuable, but one strong innings cannot hide a top-order system that keeps failing.

Overseas T20 cricket demands more than hitting range. It demands judgment. It demands game awareness. It demands batters who can understand when to attack, when to absorb, and when conditions require a different tempo.

India’s young batters are learning those lessons in public. That can be useful in the long term, but it can also damage confidence if the structure around them is poor.

The same concern appeared during India’s recent T20I struggles in Ireland, where The Sports Encounter covered Ireland’s historic clean sweep over India. This is no longer a one-match problem. It is becoming a pattern.

England Look Settled, India Look Exposed

England have turned this series into a clear message about their white-ball direction.

Brook’s captaincy has looked confident. Salt has been in excellent touch. Archer and Tongue have given them power-play bite. Curran, Jacks, and Rashid have offered control, variation, and tactical flexibility.

India, meanwhile, look caught between rebuilding and reacting.

They are backing young players, but without enough protection. They are keeping experienced options on the bench, but without proving the alternatives are ready. They are trying to play modern T20 cricket, but too often it looks like impatient batting rather than high-quality aggression.

The margin carried more than scoreboard damage.

England went 3-0 up in a five-match series, secured their first T20I series triumph over India, and completed their fastest successful chase with a target of 150 or more. For a side that has often been judged against India’s white-ball depth, this was a serious statement.

India’s problem is now impossible to dress up as one bad night. They have lost back-to-back T20I series for the first time since 2018-19, and the pattern is becoming uncomfortable: weak starts, loose shot selection, unstable selection calls, and a young batting group still searching for answers outside familiar home conditions.

Bristol did not simply give England another win.

It gave India another warning.