Dane Sweeny Upsets No 13 Lorenzo Musetti to Reach US Open Third Round
Dane Sweeny produced the biggest win of his career by beating No. 13 seed Lorenzo Musetti 3-6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 at the US Open. The Australian wildcard reached a Grand Slam third round for the first time after dominating the final three sets.
NEW YORK: Dane Sweeny lost the first set to Lorenzo Musetti and then played the next three like the higher-ranked player.
The Australian wildcard produced one of the biggest early upsets of the 2026 US Open on Thursday, defeating the No. 13 seed 3-6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 to reach the third round of a Grand Slam for the first time.
Sweeny entered Flushing Meadows ranked No. 123 in the world and making his US Open main-draw debut.
Musetti arrived as one of the established names in the men’s draw, a former world No. 5 with far greater experience at the latter stages of major tournaments.
For one set, the difference in status appeared visible.
Then the match changed completely.
Sweeny began attacking Musetti’s service games with far greater conviction, extended rallies from positions that appeared lost and repeatedly forced the Italian to play another ball.
By the end, the scoreline no longer looked like an upset produced by one inspired tiebreak or a late collapse from the favorite.
Sweeny had won three consecutive sets by margins of 6-1, 6-2 and 6-2.
That is domination.
The Sports Encounter’s US Open 2026 preview entered the tournament expecting an unusually open men’s draw after injuries and disrupted preparation removed some of the certainty around the leading contenders.
Sweeny’s breakthrough is another reminder of how quickly that openness can become opportunity.
Dane Sweeny vs Lorenzo Musetti: Match at a Glance
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Winner | Dane Sweeny |
| Loser | Lorenzo Musetti |
| Score | 3-6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 |
| Round | US Open second round |
| Sweeny ranking | World No. 123 |
| Musetti seed | No. 13 |
| Sweeny status | Wild card |
| Achievement | First career Grand Slam third round |
| Tournament appearance | US Open main-draw debut |
How Did Dane Sweeny Turn the Match Around After Losing the First Set?
He stopped allowing Musetti to dictate how the points were going to be played.
The opening set followed a recognizable Musetti pattern.
The Italian used his variety, changes of spin and ability to create angles with the one-handed backhand to move Sweeny away from comfortable hitting positions.
Sweeny competed well enough to stay involved but did not create enough consistent pressure on return.
Musetti took the set 6-3.
From the beginning of the second set, the dynamic changed.
Sweeny began standing his ground more effectively on return and attacking second serves earlier in the rally.
Instead of accepting Musetti’s variations and reacting to them, he forced the Italian into additional defensive shots.
The result was immediate.
Sweeny won the second set 6-1.
That score was the first real warning that this was no longer a conventional favorite-versus-underdog match.
The Return Battle Became the Center of the Upset
Sweeny’s ability to repeatedly break Musetti became the defining statistical theme.
Match data available immediately after the result showed Sweeny winning around half of Musetti’s service games, compared with Musetti converting only around one-fifth of his return opportunities.
That difference explains why the scoreline became increasingly one-sided.
A lower-ranked player beating a seed usually requires exceptional serving.
Sweeny produced something more interesting.
He damaged Musetti on return.
That is much harder for a favorite to solve because there is nowhere obvious to hide.
If the first serve misses, the second serve becomes vulnerable.
If rallies extend, the returning player remains involved.
If service games repeatedly become physical, pressure accumulates even when the server survives.
Sweeny made Musetti work for almost everything after the first set.
Why Did the Third Set Matter More Than the Second?
Winning the second set 6-1 proved Sweeny could disrupt Musetti.
The third proved the disruption was sustainable.
Upsets often contain one spectacular set.
The favorite then resets.
Serving improves.
Unforced errors decline.
The ranking gap begins to reappear.
That never happened here.
Sweeny continued attacking Musetti’s service games and protecting his own baseline position.
He moved 3-0 ahead in the third before Musetti required a medical timeout.
The Italian had already endured physical problems during the season and had missed Wimbledon because of a thigh injury.
He appeared physically compromised as the match progressed.
That context matters.
It should not erase what Sweeny did.
The Australian still had to manage the lead, stay disciplined and avoid allowing sympathy, uncertainty or the interruption to disturb his rhythm.
He finished the third set 6-2.
What Happened With Lorenzo Musetti Physically?
Musetti required an off-court medical timeout during the third set after appearing increasingly uncomfortable physically.
The exact nature of the problem was not immediately clear from official tournament information available after the match.
Some courtside reports described him as looking unwell or physically limited.
What can be stated safely is that the No. 13 seed needed medical attention while trailing in the third set and never recovered his earlier movement or control afterward.
That is important given his 2026 injury history.
Musetti had already missed Wimbledon after a thigh problem disrupted his season.
His return to North American hard courts had shown encouraging signs.
The Sports Encounter covered his controlled win over Michael Zheng in our Cincinnati Open tournament wrap, when Musetti looked capable of building momentum toward New York.
He later reached the Cincinnati quarterfinals before losing to Frances Tiafoe, a run examined in our Cincinnati final and US Open race analysis.
The US Open offered a chance to extend that recovery.
Sweeny ended it.
Why Sweeny’s Acrobatic Tennis Became More Than Entertainment
One of the most memorable points of the match involved Sweeny throwing himself toward a forehand volley and producing the type of diving winner associated with Boris Becker’s most athletic years.
That style is not new.
The official US Open profile of Sweeny after Round 1 noted that the 5-foot-7 Australian regularly dives for balls and has developed a permanent fluid buildup around his forearm from repeatedly landing on the same area.
Sweeny described it simply.
“I’ll throw my body around to do that.”
The line explains his tennis better than any marketing description could.
Against Musetti, those retrieval skills became strategically important.
Points the Italian expected to finish kept returning.
That can wear down an opponent psychologically.
A clean winner becomes another defensive shot.
A successful drop shot becomes a scramble.
A point that appears complete continues for another three or four strokes.
For a player already experiencing physical discomfort, that additional work becomes even more expensive.
The Quiet Tea Ceremony Behind One of the US Open’s Loudest Upsets
Sweeny’s preparation for his breakthrough New York run is unusually understated.
He has credited a daily tea ceremony with helping him remain calm during the tournament.
His partner introduced the routine.
They wake in the morning, prepare tea slowly in their hotel room and create a period of deliberate quiet before entering the noise of New York and Grand Slam tennis.
The ritual became part of the story after his first-round victory over Corentin Moutet.
According to the US Open’s official account, Sweeny believed the routine helped him stay detached from the nerves and doubts that normally accompany a major tournament.
That calm was required against Moutet.
It may have been even more valuable against Musetti.
Sweeny’s First-Round Win Already Contained Warning Signs for Musetti
Sweeny did not arrive in Round 2 accidentally.
He defeated Corentin Moutet 7-6(4), 6-4, 3-0 when the Frenchman retired.
The match was Sweeny’s first in a US Open main draw.
He had trailed 5-2 in the opening set before recovering.
That comeback showed several qualities that later appeared against Musetti.
Patience.
Retrieval.
Emotional control.
Willingness to stay inside long points.
And an ability to continue playing aggressively after an uncomfortable start.
The Sports Encounter has repeatedly tracked how major tournaments can reward players who arrive without the burden carried by the highest seeds.
Our National Bank Open analysis of favorites falling and new players rising showed the same pattern during the Canadian swing.
Sweeny has now carried it onto the biggest stage.
Why Was Musetti Such a Significant Opponent for Sweeny?
Because this was not merely a victory over a seeded player.
Musetti represents a completely different competitive level from most of Sweeny’s career opposition.
The Italian has been ranked as high as world No. 5.
He has played deep into Grand Slam tournaments.
His one-handed backhand, movement and tactical variety make him one of the more difficult players on tour to prepare for.
Before Thursday, Sweeny had spent much of his professional life grinding through Challengers, ITF events and qualifying draws.
The ATP’s official Sweeny biography shows a player who built his career gradually rather than arriving through immediate junior superstardom.
He broke into the Top 300 in 2022 and the Top 200 late in 2025.
His first Grand Slam main-draw appearance came at the 2024 Australian Open.
He then spent years trying to convert Challenger-level progress into sustained ATP opportunities.
Beating Musetti changes the scale of his resume immediately.
This Was Not Sweeny’s Grand Slam Debut
That distinction is worth making because the achievement is impressive enough without exaggeration.
Sweeny made his Grand Slam main-draw debut at the 2024 Australian Open after qualifying.
He lost a five-set first-round match to Francisco Cerúndolo.
He also reached the Wimbledon main draw in 2026 after qualifying, where Grigor Dimitrov defeated him in the first round.
New York is his US Open debut.
It is also the first time he has won two matches in the same Grand Slam main draw.
Now he is in Round 3.
Why the Wild Card Matters
Sweeny did not qualify through the US Open qualifying tournament.
He received a main-draw wild card through the reciprocal agreement with Tennis Australia.
The US Open’s official wildcard announcement confirms that Sweeny received the place after Alexei Popyrin moved directly into the main draw following another withdrawal.
Reciprocal wild cards are occasionally criticized because they place lower-ranked players directly into major draws.
Sweeny’s run is precisely why they exist.
The opportunity allowed an Australian outside the Top 100 to test himself against the main draw.
He has now beaten Moutet and Musetti.
The invitation has already justified itself competitively.
What Does This Upset Say About the Men’s US Open Draw?
It is becoming more open by the session.
Musetti is not the only prominent seed to disappear early.
Felix Auger-Aliassime, the No. 3 seed, was also eliminated Thursday by Karen Khachanov.
Other established names had already departed.
The Sports Encounter’s US Open men’s title-race analysis began with the premise that injuries and disrupted preparation had created unusual uncertainty before the first round.
Every high seed that exits enlarges the opportunity beneath them.
For Sweeny, that matters directly.
A player who begins a tournament expecting to survive one round can suddenly find himself looking at a section of the draw without the name originally expected to control it.
The Musetti Exit Continues a Strange North American Hard-Court Season
Musetti’s summer had looked as though it was stabilizing.
He struggled earlier in Montreal, where the men’s draw lost several major contenders in quick succession.
The Sports Encounter’s National Bank Open first-week review documented that chaos, with Musetti among a group of established men unable to survive the tournament’s early stages.
Cincinnati was better.
He defeated Michael Zheng convincingly, advanced through the middle rounds and reached the quarterfinals.
That run suggested his hard-court game was becoming more stable before New York.
The US Open has reversed that progress abruptly.
Why Musetti’s Playing Style Can Become Vulnerable Against Relentless Defenders
Musetti’s variety is usually an advantage.
He changes height.
He changes spin.
He uses the slice.
He moves opponents forward with drop shots.
He can create angles few players attempt.
The weakness appears when an opponent repeatedly refuses to let those variations finish points.
Sweeny’s speed and willingness to scramble turned several of Musetti’s creative patterns into extended exchanges.
That forced the Italian to generate another attacking shot.
When physical discomfort appeared, the cost increased.
Sweeny did not need to out-style Musetti.
He needed to make style insufficient.
How Important Was Sweeny’s Mental Control?
Probably as important as his shot-making.
He lost the first set against a player ranked more than 100 positions above him.
The predictable response would have been to chase the match too aggressively.
Sweeny did not.
He maintained his patterns and increased pressure incrementally.
The second set went 6-1.
The third went 6-2.
The fourth went 6-2.
The match therefore became easier for Sweeny as the stakes became greater.
That is unusual for a player experiencing the deepest Grand Slam run of his career.
The Scoreline Shows How Completely the Momentum Shifted
| Set | Sweeny | Musetti | Match Story |
|---|---|---|---|
| First | 3 | 6 | Musetti controls the early pattern |
| Second | 6 | 1 | Sweeny attacks the return and resets the match |
| Third | 6 | 2 | Sweeny sustains pressure as Musetti struggles physically |
| Fourth | 6 | 2 | Australian closes without allowing a comeback |
Sweeny won 18 of the final 23 games after losing the first set.
That is the number that best captures how dramatic the reversal became.
Once the second set started, Musetti won only five games across three sets.
Why Closing the Match Matters Almost as Much as Creating the Upset
Lower-ranked players frequently reach the point where an upset becomes possible.
Finishing is harder.
The favorite begins swinging with less pressure.
The crowd senses the moment.
The underdog starts thinking about rankings, money, the next round and the significance of the result.
Sweeny avoided that trap.
There was no fourth-set collapse.
There was no five-set survival exercise.
He won the fourth set by the same 6-2 margin as the third.
That made the result feel less like a lucky opening and more like a performance worthy of the next round.
What Does This Mean Financially for Dane Sweeny?
Grand Slam breakthroughs change careers partly because of prize money.
A player ranked outside the Top 100 spends much of the year paying for flights, hotels, coaching, physiotherapy and tournament travel while earning far less than the sport’s leading names.
Reaching the US Open third round guarantees a substantial payday compared with a normal Challenger week.
That can fund an entire block of future competition.
It can allow a player to travel with more support.
It can reduce the pressure to chase lower-level events every week.
And it can provide the financial stability required to plan rather than survive.
Sweeny’s breakthrough therefore matters well beyond one ranking result.
How Does Sweeny’s Rise Fit Australia’s Current Men’s Tennis Depth?
Australia already has Alex de Minaur established near the top of the men’s game.
Alexei Popyrin has become a dangerous hard-court player.
Tristan Schoolkate continues progressing.
Several other Australians are competing regularly across ATP and Challenger events.
Sweeny adds a different profile.
He is smaller than many modern men’s players and does not possess an overpowering serve.
His pathway depends more heavily on movement, return quality, redirection and competitiveness.
That makes his breakthrough valuable because it demonstrates there is more than one route through modern power tennis.
North American Hard Courts Have Rewarded Breakthrough Players All Summer
Sweeny’s run fits a broader trend.
The Canadian swing produced major performances from players outside the expected championship group.
The Sports Encounter’s National Bank Open preview asked which players would use Montreal and Toronto to establish themselves before the US Open.
That question kept producing unexpected answers.
Ben Shelton eventually defended his Montreal title, becoming one of the central men’s stories of the hard-court swing.
Our analysis of Shelton’s title defense showed how rapidly momentum can grow when a player starts winning repeatedly against strong opposition.
Sweeny is nowhere near that level of achievement yet.
He has just discovered the same basic opportunity.
Win again and perception changes quickly.
Could This Be More Than One Great Week?
That is now the central question.
One upset does not establish a Top 50 player.
Two wins at one major do not guarantee sustained tour success.
Sweeny’s career has already included long stretches on the Challenger and ITF circuits.
What New York provides is evidence.
He has shown that his game can disturb a player of Musetti’s quality over five-set conditions.
He has shown he can recover after losing the first set.
He has shown he can handle the emotional pressure of approaching a career-best result.
Those are meaningful data points.
Why the Upset Matters for the US Open as a Tournament
Grand Slams need stories that do not begin with the top eight seeds.
The scale of a major becomes most visible when a player who normally competes far from the biggest courts suddenly finds himself central to the tournament conversation.
Sweeny entered through a reciprocal wild card.
He had never played a US Open main-draw match.
Two victories later, he has removed one of the top 16 seeds.
That is the ecosystem majors are supposed to create.
The favorites provide the global audience.
The underdogs provide the possibility that the bracket will not behave as expected.
Why This Is One of the Biggest Early Upsets of the 2026 US Open
The ranking gap is substantial.
Sweeny entered at No. 123.
Musetti was the No. 13 seed and ranked around the Top 15.
Pre-match expectations heavily favored the Italian.
More importantly, the upset did not come through a narrow five-set escape.
Sweeny won the final three sets 18 games to five.
That margin changes how the result should be understood.
He did not merely survive Musetti.
He took the match away from him.
What Should We Make of the Boris Becker Comparisons?
They should remain visual rather than historical.
Sweeny’s diving forehand volley naturally reminded observers of Becker’s famous habit of throwing himself toward low volleys on grass and hard courts.
That does not make Sweeny the next Becker.
It does reveal something about his personality as a player.
He values one more ball enough to risk landing on the court.
He is prepared to improvise outside conventional technique.
He does not appear concerned with making a point look clean.
The result can be chaotic.
Against Musetti, it was effective.
What Happens Next for Sweeny?
The third round will bring an entirely new pressure.
The Australian is no longer anonymous.
Opponents now have two US Open matches to study.
Scouting reports will emphasize his court coverage, return aggression and willingness to extend rallies from defensive positions.
That is the next stage of a breakthrough.
Surprising one established player is difficult.
Winning once opponents begin preparing specifically for the qualities that created the surprise is harder.
What Does Musetti Need to Take From This Defeat?
First, clarity about his physical condition.
His 2026 season has already been interrupted by injury.
Another physical issue at a Grand Slam requires proper assessment before attention shifts toward results.
Second, Musetti will need to examine why the return games deteriorated so badly after the opening set.
Even if physical limitations contributed, losing three sets 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 reflects more than one isolated bad patch.
Third, the defeat reinforces how difficult it can be for creative, variation-heavy players when movement is compromised.
Musetti’s game depends on arriving early enough to create options.
Once those options disappear, the entire structure becomes less threatening.
Final Verdict: Dane Sweeny Did More Than Produce an Upset
The simplest version of the story is irresistible.
World No. 123 beats No. 13 seed.
Wild card reaches the third round.
Australian produces one of the surprises of the tournament.
The match deserves a deeper reading.
Dane Sweeny lost the first set and then improved.
That is what separates this performance from many major upsets.
He did not catch Musetti cold for 30 minutes.
He did not steal two tiebreaks.
He did not wait for the favorite to collapse in a fifth set.
He identified where the match could be changed and began winning return games at a rate Musetti could not absorb.
He retrieved balls that should have ended points.
He remained aggressive when the opportunity grew larger.
He handled the medical interruption without losing concentration.
And when the fourth set arrived, he closed the match 6-2 rather than inviting Musetti back into it.
That is the part worth remembering.
Sweeny’s career has been built away from the cameras through ITF tournaments, Challenger draws and qualifying rounds.
He received a US Open wild card through Tennis Australia’s reciprocal agreement.
He used it to beat Moutet.
Then he beat Musetti.
The first career Grand Slam third round is now his.
Whether this becomes the beginning of a permanent rise will be decided over months rather than one New York afternoon.
But the biggest breakthrough of Sweeny’s career no longer needs projection.
It has already happened.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Dane Sweeny vs Lorenzo Musetti score?
Dane Sweeny defeated Lorenzo Musetti 3-6, 6-1, 6-2, 6-2 in the second round of the 2026 US Open.
What is Dane Sweeny’s ranking?
Sweeny entered the match ranked world No. 123.
What seed was Lorenzo Musetti at the US Open?
Musetti was the No. 13 seed.
Is this Dane Sweeny’s first Grand Slam third round?
Yes. The victory over Musetti sent Sweeny into the third round of a Grand Slam for the first time in his career.
Is the 2026 US Open Sweeny’s Grand Slam debut?
No. Sweeny previously played in the Australian Open and Wimbledon main draws. The 2026 tournament is his US Open main-draw debut.
How did Dane Sweeny qualify for the US Open?
Sweeny received a main-draw wild card through the reciprocal agreement between the USTA and Tennis Australia.
Who did Dane Sweeny beat in the first round?
He defeated Corentin Moutet 7-6(4), 6-4, 3-0 when Moutet retired.
Did Lorenzo Musetti need a medical timeout?
Yes. Musetti required medical treatment during the third set while trailing. The precise nature of the problem was not immediately confirmed by official tournament sources.
Why was Sweeny’s diving shot compared with Boris Becker?
Sweeny produced an acrobatic diving forehand volley during the match, recalling the type of full-extension court dives made famous by Boris Becker.
Why is Sweeny’s win considered such a major upset?
The Australian was ranked No. 123 and facing the No. 13 seed. He also won the final three sets 6-1, 6-2, 6-2, making the result a decisive reversal rather than a narrow upset.
Breaking News
Aryna Sabalenka Has a Complaint at the US Open
Aryna Sabalenka paused during her third-round US Open match against Kamilla Rakhimova to complain about a strong marijuana smell around Louis Armstrong Stadium. She still won 6-3, 6-4, but the incident raised an unusual question about what tournament organizers can control inside an outdoor New York venue.
NEW YORK, September 4, 2026: Aryna Sabalenka has spent the opening week of the US Open dealing comfortably with opponents, expectations and the pressure of chasing a third consecutive title.
On Friday, something far less conventional briefly interrupted her rhythm.
The world No. 1 complained to the chair umpire about a strong smell of marijuana during her third-round match against Kamilla Rakhimova at Louis Armstrong Stadium, saying the odor was difficult to handle while trying to compete at full concentration.
Sabalenka still won 6-3, 6-4 and moved into the Round of 16, where she will face American Taylor Townsend. The incident did not change the result, but it produced one of the more unusual discussions of the tournament because the US Open operates a smoke-free venue while sitting inside a part of New York where activity outside the grounds cannot always be controlled.
No spectator was identified as smoking inside the tennis center, and nobody was removed over the incident.
The USTA said it remained vigilant in enforcing the smoke-free environment at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center but acknowledged that it cannot control everything taking place beyond the tournament grounds.
Sabalenka’s complaint therefore leaves the US Open with an awkward problem. The tournament can police behavior inside the gates. Wind, surrounding parkland and activity outside those gates are considerably harder to regulate.
For Sabalenka, the matter was frustrating rather than decisive. She recovered, defeated Rakhimova and continued a title defense that began with a straight-sets victory over Camila Osorio and then accelerated with a dominant second-round performance.
Aryna Sabalenka vs Kamilla Rakhimova: Match at a Glance
| Match Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Tournament | US Open 2026 |
| Round | Women’s Singles, Round 3 |
| Venue | Louis Armstrong Stadium, New York |
| Result | Aryna Sabalenka beat Kamilla Rakhimova 6-3, 6-4 |
| Sabalenka seed | No. 1 |
| Key interruption | Sabalenka complained about a strong marijuana odor while serving |
| Next opponent | Taylor Townsend |
| US Open objective | Third consecutive women’s singles title |
What Happened During Sabalenka’s Match?
The moment came early.
Sabalenka was serving in the third game when she prepared to begin a point, tossed the ball and then allowed it to drop instead of completing the serve.
She reset and tried again.
The same thing happened.
Something was clearly interfering with her preparation, and Sabalenka eventually walked toward the chair umpire to explain the problem.
She later said the marijuana smell was unusually strong and that she could not determine whether it was coming directly from the crowd or being carried into the stadium by the wind.
Her concern was practical rather than moral.
Sabalenka made clear afterward that what people choose to do away from the court is their own business. Her objection was having the smell reach a professional tennis court while she was trying to serve and compete.
That distinction matters.
This was not a player entering a wider debate about marijuana laws. It was a player asking for the competition environment around her match to remain as controlled as possible.
The US Open Is Officially Smoke-Free
The tournament’s own regulations support Sabalenka’s expectation.
The official US Open Code of Conduct prohibits spectators from smoking, vaping or using electronic smoking devices within the facility.
The tournament’s prohibited-items policy also bars illegal substances from being brought onto the grounds.
The practical difficulty on Friday was enforcement.
Tournament officials did not find a spectator smoking inside the venue. That meant there was nobody to warn or remove.
The USTA’s position was that the tennis center remains smoke-free and that security and guest-services staff will intervene when they become aware of prohibited smoking.
What they cannot guarantee is that air entering the grounds will remain unaffected by activity elsewhere around Flushing Meadows.
The Source of the Smell Was Never Confirmed
That is the most important detail to preserve.
There is no verified evidence that somebody sitting inside Louis Armstrong Stadium was smoking marijuana.
Sabalenka herself did not claim to know the source.
She suggested it could have come from the crowd or from outside because of the wind.
The distinction protects the story from becoming something it is not.
This is a confirmed complaint about an odor.
It is not a confirmed case of a spectator openly smoking courtside.
Why a Smell Can Matter More Than It Sounds
Elite tennis depends heavily on routine.
Players bounce the ball a certain number of times. They regulate breathing. They reset their grip. They control the timing between points and build familiar sequences around serves, returns and changeovers.
Serving is particularly sensitive because the player initiates everything.
Visual movement, crowd noise, unexpected sounds and other sensory distractions can interrupt the sequence before the ball is struck.
Sabalenka’s reaction showed that the odor was strong enough to break that routine twice.
She recovered quickly, but the larger point remains relevant for tournament organizers.
A controlled sporting environment is about more than keeping spectators quiet during serves.
Lighting, sound, movement, temperature, air flow and unexpected distractions all shape how players experience a match.
Sabalenka Still Had to Solve a Much Tougher Tennis Problem
The marijuana episode became the unusual headline, but Rakhimova provided the more persistent challenge.
Sabalenka won the first set 6-3 before being pushed considerably harder in the second.
The second set lasted 54 minutes, which was one minute longer than Sabalenka’s entire second-round match.
That is a useful measure of how much more demanding Friday became.
Sabalenka praised Rakhimova afterward for forcing her to raise her level.
Rakhimova had entered the match after eliminating No. 27 seed Barbora Krejcikova earlier in the tournament and had already shown she was capable of disrupting more established opponents.
Sabalenka handled the challenge without dropping a set.
Her US Open Has Become Progressively More Demanding
Sabalenka arrived in Round 3 after one of the cleanest starts among the leading women.
She defeated Camila Osorio in straight sets to begin her title defense, a performance covered in The Sports Encounter’s opening report on Sabalenka and Carlos Alcaraz.
She then dismantled Polina Iatcenko 6-1, 6-1 in Round 2.
The Sports Encounter’s full first-week US Open analysis noted that Sabalenka had dropped only seven games through her first two matches and appeared to be moving through New York with considerably less physical stress than several other contenders.
Rakhimova changed that pattern slightly.
| Round | Opponent | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Camila Osorio | Won in straight sets |
| Round 2 | Polina Iatcenko | 6-1, 6-1 |
| Round 3 | Kamilla Rakhimova | 6-3, 6-4 |
The third round demanded more problem-solving, more time on court and an unusual interruption.
Sabalenka still left without surrendering a set.
The Complaint Fits an Already Unusual US Open
This tournament has rarely settled into a conventional rhythm.
Rain repeatedly disrupted qualifying and the opening rounds.
First-round matches were still being completed while other players were already reaching Round 3.
Novak Djokovic suffered a major opening-round defeat.
Jannik Sinner withdrew before the tournament because of injury.
Several seeded players departed early.
The full picture was documented in our analysis of the rain, exits and changing title race.
Even when the weather finally became less dominant, New York found another way to remind players that Grand Slam tennis here is rarely sterile.
New York Has Always Been Part of the US Open Experience
The US Open is different from many major tennis events because the tournament has never been isolated from its city.
Aircraft pass overhead.
Trains move nearby.
Crowds are louder than at many other Grand Slams.
Music, food, movement and city noise form part of the atmosphere.
Players who thrive in New York often speak about feeding off that energy rather than trying to remove themselves from it.
That energy has limits.
A player can enjoy a loud stadium and still expect the competition area to respect basic venue rules.
Sabalenka’s complaint sits exactly at that intersection.
This Is Not the First Time a Player Has Raised the Issue
The situation is not entirely new.
Nick Kyrgios and Maria Sakkari have both complained about marijuana odors during previous US Open matches.
Those earlier incidents are relevant because they show that Friday was not a completely isolated occurrence.
The recurring nature of the issue makes the source question harder rather than easier.
If tournament security repeatedly finds no one smoking within the facility, officials have limited options when the odor originates elsewhere.
The USTA can enforce conduct rules within its controlled footprint.
It cannot place a roof over Flushing Meadows.
Sabalenka Eventually Found the Funny Side
Her frustration did not last into the post-match press conference.
Sabalenka later joked about whether spectators might have been trying to slow things down because her matches had been moving too quickly.
The humor was consistent with how she has increasingly handled unexpected moments during the later phase of her career.
Earlier versions of Sabalenka could become visibly frustrated when matches moved outside the expected rhythm.
The current version is far better at separating annoyance from performance.
Friday was another example.
She complained.
The issue was not immediately solved.
She kept playing.
She won.
That Emotional Control Is Part of Why She Is Chasing History
Sabalenka entered New York trying to win a third consecutive US Open women’s singles title.
No woman has achieved that since Serena Williams won three straight championships from 2012 through 2014.
The historical target was one of the central themes in The Sports Encounter’s complete US Open 2026 curtain-raiser.
Her path was also examined after the draw in our analysis of Sabalenka’s route through the women’s bracket.
A third title requires more than superior ball striking.
Grand Slam champions eventually face bad weather, awkward opponents, long matches, hostile crowds, scheduling disruption or moments nobody anticipated.
Friday’s problem happened to involve the air around Louis Armstrong Stadium.
Taylor Townsend Is a Much Bigger Concern Now
Sabalenka can leave the marijuana complaint behind because the tennis challenge immediately becomes more serious.
Taylor Townsend awaits in the Round of 16.
The American defeated No. 15 seed Diana Shnaider 6-2, 6-7(3), 6-3 to reach the fourth round for the second consecutive year.
Townsend entered the tournament playing some of the best serving tennis of her career.
In Round 2, she defeated Taylah Preston 6-1, 6-1 while winning every one of her 23 first-serve points.
The official US Open profile of Townsend’s serving form showed how dangerous she has become in short points.
Sabalenka will therefore move from an unusual environmental distraction into a matchup against a confident left-hander with a strong serve and a home crowd behind her.
Townsend Has Reasons to Believe She Can Make This Difficult
Townsend has already reached the US Open Round of 16 multiple times and has become increasingly comfortable on major New York courts.
She has also developed into one of the world’s best doubles players, giving her superior instincts around the net and more willingness than many modern singles players to shorten points by moving forward.
That creates an interesting stylistic contrast.
Sabalenka will want to control exchanges through first-strike power.
Townsend can change height, direction and court positioning more frequently.
Sabalenka remains the clear favorite.
The matchup is far more complicated than the ranking gap alone suggests.
Sabalenka Has Already Experienced One Unexpected US Open Exit
Her singles campaign has been highly controlled so far, but her New York tournament did include one earlier surprise.
Sabalenka and Novak Djokovic entered the redesigned mixed doubles event as the top seeds and were eliminated by Katerina Siniakova and Henry Patten.
The Sports Encounter’s analysis of that mixed doubles upset showed how specialist movement and partnership instincts overcame superstar singles credentials.
It was another reminder that nothing at this US Open has been entirely straightforward.
Her Cincinnati Exit Also Makes This Run More Interesting
Sabalenka did not arrive in New York carrying perfect form.
Sara Bejlek stunned her 7-6(7), 6-4 in the Cincinnati round of 16, one of the biggest results of the pre-US Open swing.
That defeat is covered in The Sports Encounter’s Cincinnati knockout-round report.
The response in New York has been considerably sharper.
Sabalenka has avoided dropping a set through three rounds and has managed each type of test differently.
Why This Story Matters Beyond the Joke
The marijuana angle naturally attracts attention because it is unusual.
The serious question underneath it concerns competition standards.
Professional tournaments invest heavily in creating consistent playing conditions.
Courts are measured.
Balls are standardized.
Officials enforce time rules.
Security manages crowd behavior.
Players expect distractions that can reasonably be controlled to be controlled.
The difficulty in New York is that an outdoor venue remains connected to its surrounding environment.
The US Open can prohibit smoking.
It can remove people who violate the rule.
It cannot guarantee that every smell reaching an outdoor stadium began inside its security perimeter.
Sabalenka’s complaint exposes that limitation unusually clearly.
The Sports Encounter Verdict
Aryna Sabalenka had a legitimate reason to raise the issue.
The US Open also appears to have enforced the part of the problem it could reasonably control.
No spectator was caught smoking inside the venue, no one was removed, and the tournament maintains an explicit smoke-free policy.
That leaves the hardest part unresolved.
If the odor came from outside the grounds and was carried toward Louis Armstrong Stadium by the wind, there may have been very little tournament officials could do in that moment.
What Sabalenka could control was her response.
She stopped twice.
She spoke to the umpire.
She reset.
Then she beat Rakhimova 6-3, 6-4.
The complaint will generate headlines because of its unusual subject.
The tennis story remains more important.
Sabalenka is into the Round of 16 without dropping a set, her bid for a third consecutive US Open title remains alive, and Taylor Townsend now represents a far more meaningful obstacle than anything drifting through the New York air.
Follow the latest US Open results, player stories and Grand Slam analysis through The Sports Encounter Tennis Hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Aryna Sabalenka’s complaint at the US Open?
Sabalenka complained about a strong smell of marijuana while serving during her third-round match against Kamilla Rakhimova at Louis Armstrong Stadium.
Did marijuana smoke stop Sabalenka’s match?
The match was briefly interrupted while Sabalenka spoke to the chair umpire, but play continued and she completed the match.
Was anyone caught smoking marijuana at the US Open?
No spectator was identified as smoking and nobody was ejected in connection with Sabalenka’s complaint.
Is smoking allowed at the US Open?
No. The US Open Code of Conduct prohibits smoking, vaping and electronic smoking devices within the tournament facility.
Did Aryna Sabalenka beat Kamilla Rakhimova?
Yes. Sabalenka won 6-3, 6-4 to reach the fourth round.
Who does Aryna Sabalenka play next?
Sabalenka faces American Taylor Townsend in the Round of 16.
Has Sabalenka lost a set at the 2026 US Open?
No. Sabalenka has advanced through her first three singles matches without dropping a set.
Is Aryna Sabalenka the defending US Open champion?
Yes. Sabalenka has won the last two US Open women’s singles titles and is attempting to win a third consecutive championship.
When was the last women’s US Open three-peat?
Serena Williams won three consecutive US Open women’s singles titles from 2012 through 2014.
Have other tennis players complained about marijuana smells at the US Open?
Yes. Nick Kyrgios and Maria Sakkari are among players who have raised similar complaints during previous tournaments in New York.
Breaking News
Ipswich Town 0-2 Liverpool: Isak Double Gives Iraola First Win as Gakpo Drives Ruthless Start
Alexander Isak scored twice inside nine minutes and Cody Gakpo assisted both goals as Liverpool beat Ipswich Town 2-0 at Portman Road. The result gave Andoni Iraola his first win as Liverpool manager, while Ronald Araújo made his first start and Bradley Barcola debuted from the bench.
IPSWICH, England, September 4, 2026: Liverpool spent their first two Premier League matches under Andoni Iraola showing enough attacking quality to score twice and enough defensive vulnerability to surrender the same number.
At Portman Road, they finally completed both sides of the job.
Alexander Isak scored twice inside the opening nine minutes, Cody Gakpo created both goals, and Liverpool beat newly promoted Ipswich Town 2-0 to collect their first league victory of the 2026-27 season.
The match was effectively decided before many supporters had settled into their seats.
Isak struck in the sixth minute and again three minutes later, punishing an Ipswich defense that failed to deal with Liverpool’s early movement and the speed of Gakpo’s decisions around the penalty area.
What followed was less spectacular but arguably just as useful for Iraola.
Liverpool controlled the lead, avoided the defensive mistakes that had cost them against Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest, and completed their first clean sheet of the campaign.
Ronald Araújo made his first Liverpool start, Bradley Barcola came off the bench for his debut following his move from Paris Saint-Germain, and Gakpo reinforced his importance at a time when Liverpool’s attacking hierarchy is still being reshaped after Mohamed Salah’s departure.
The Sports Encounter entered the season describing Liverpool as one of the Premier League’s biggest title-race wildcards.
Three matches later, that description still fits.
Liverpool remain a work in progress, but the first win has arrived.
Ipswich Town 0-2 Liverpool: Match at a Glance
| Match Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Competition | Premier League 2026-27 |
| Matchweek | 3 |
| Venue | Portman Road |
| Date | September 4, 2026 |
| Result | Ipswich Town 0-2 Liverpool |
| Liverpool scorers | Alexander Isak 6′, 9′ |
| Assists | Cody Gakpo, both goals |
| Liverpool manager | Andoni Iraola |
| Major milestone | Iraola’s first competitive win as Liverpool head coach |
| Liverpool record | 1 win, 2 draws from 3 Premier League matches |
| Liverpool points | 5 |
| Ipswich points | 3 |
| Clean sheet | Liverpool’s first of the league season |
The official Premier League fixture list confirms the Matchweek 3 schedule, while Liverpool’s official team announcement confirmed Araújo’s first start and Barcola’s place among the substitutes.
Alexander Isak Needed Nine Minutes to Change Liverpool’s Evening
Liverpool had drawn their opening two league matches 2-2.
That created an unusual early pressure around a club expected to compete for Champions League places and potentially push higher if Iraola could quickly impose his ideas.
The first match at Newcastle had required a stoppage-time Dominik Szoboszlai penalty to rescue a point.
The second, against Nottingham Forest at Anfield, followed a similar pattern. Liverpool twice fell behind before Isak and Victor Muñoz responded to earn another 2-2 draw.
The opening-weekend chaos was documented in The Sports Encounter’s Premier League Matchweek 1 wrap.
Portman Road produced something very different.
Isak gave Liverpool the lead after six minutes.
Three minutes later, he scored again.
Two goals from Liverpool’s £125 million striker had transformed a potentially difficult Friday-night away game into a match the visitors could manage from a position of control.
Cody Gakpo Created Both Goals
Isak supplied the finishing.
Gakpo supplied the openings.
The Dutch international assisted both early goals and became the most important attacking player in Liverpool’s decisive first spell.
His performance carries extra significance because Liverpool’s forward line is undergoing a substantial transformation.
Salah is gone.
Barcola has arrived.
Isak remains the most expensive player in Premier League history.
Florian Wirtz operates behind the attacking line.
Victor Muñoz has begun receiving first-team opportunities.
Gakpo therefore entered the season surrounded by questions about exactly where he would sit within Iraola’s preferred attack.
The answer after three league matches is becoming clearer.
He remains extremely difficult to leave out.
Why Gakpo’s Performance Matters in the Post-Salah Liverpool
Liverpool’s attack used to have an obvious gravitational center.
Salah produced goals at such a consistent rate that many attacking questions eventually returned to the same solution.
His departure for Trabzonspor, covered in The Sports Encounter’s report on the end of his Liverpool career, forced the club to distribute responsibility differently.
Isak offers elite finishing.
Wirtz brings creativity between the lines.
Barcola adds pace and one-on-one threat.
Gakpo provides something slightly different: physical strength, finishing, combination play and enough positional flexibility to connect several versions of the attack.
Iraola had praised him before the match, describing Gakpo as an intelligent player who had trained and performed well despite uncertainty around the transfer market.
Two assists at Ipswich provided the best possible response.
Isak Now Looks Ready to Lead the New Attack
The brace also matters because Liverpool paid an extraordinary price to make Isak their long-term attacking reference.
The Sports Encounter’s analysis of the Premier League’s five most expensive signings placed Isak at the top after his £125 million move from Newcastle.
That fee brings a very specific kind of expectation.
Contribution is insufficient.
Isak is expected to decide games.
He did exactly that here.
His first goal immediately damaged Ipswich’s defensive plan.
The second forced Gary O’Neil’s newly promoted side to chase a match against one of the most talented attacking squads in England.
That is precisely what Liverpool paid for.
Isak Has Already Scored Against Both of Liverpool’s Opening Opponents
His first Liverpool goal of the new league season came against Nottingham Forest.
Now he has added two more at Ipswich.
| 2026-27 Premier League Match | Isak Contribution |
|---|---|
| Newcastle 2-2 Liverpool | Started against former club |
| Liverpool 2-2 Nottingham Forest | 1 goal |
| Ipswich 0-2 Liverpool | 2 goals |
Three goals through Liverpool’s first three league fixtures gives Iraola the reliable central scoring presence he needs while the wider attacking structure continues developing.
Ronald Araújo’s First Start Helped Liverpool Solve a More Urgent Problem
The goals will dominate discussion around Friday night.
The clean sheet may be more important to Liverpool’s coach.
Liverpool had conceded twice against Newcastle.
They conceded twice again against Forest.
Their full-back and central defensive relationships were already becoming one of the first tactical questions of Iraola’s tenure.
Araújo made his first Liverpool start at Portman Road after arriving from Barcelona, replacing Jeremie Frimpong in the only change from the Forest match.
The move itself was examined when The Sports Encounter reported on Araújo’s surprise switch to Liverpool.
His first start coincided with Liverpool’s first clean sheet.
One match does not solve the defensive debate, but it gives Iraola something concrete to work with before the level of opposition increases.
Virgil van Dijk and Liverpool Finally Get a Quiet Second Half
For two league matches, Liverpool’s defenders had been forced into repeated high-pressure situations.
The early Isak double changed that.
Van Dijk, Jérémy Jacquet, Milos Kerkez and Araújo could defend a lead rather than chase a game.
That difference matters tactically.
Iraola’s football asks defenders to operate aggressively when Liverpool push higher.
The danger appears when pressing distances become too large or the first defensive action fails.
Ipswich were never able to exploit those spaces often enough to turn the game.
Alisson therefore completed the clean sheet Liverpool had been missing.
Bradley Barcola Makes His Liverpool Debut
Another major summer signing entered during the second half.
Barcola came off the bench for his first Liverpool appearance following his transfer from Paris Saint-Germain.
The circumstances were ideal for a debut.
Liverpool already led by two.
Ipswich had to move higher.
Barcola could therefore attack space without carrying the responsibility of rescuing the match.
His arrival also creates an intriguing selection question.
Gakpo had just spent the evening producing two assists.
Any expectation that the new signing would automatically displace him now looks far too simplistic.
Iraola may instead have enough quality to rotate different combinations depending on the opponent.
Liverpool’s Summer Spending Is Starting to Appear on the Pitch
English football has just completed another extraordinary transfer window.
The Sports Encounter calculated that Premier League clubs committed approximately £3.46 billion during the summer, a record explored in our analysis of the league’s unprecedented 2026 spending.
Liverpool are part of that financial escalation.
Isak arrived for a British-record £125 million the previous year.
Wirtz cost up to £116.5 million.
Barcola adds another elite attacking investment.
Araújo strengthens the defense.
The club therefore cannot frame this season as a simple transition without expectations.
The squad has been built to return Liverpool to the highest level of English and European competition.
Portman Road was the first night this league season when several pieces looked connected.
Andoni Iraola Finally Has His First Liverpool Victory
Iraola arrived at Anfield after building Bournemouth into one of the Premier League’s most aggressive pressing teams.
The Sports Encounter’s full Premier League season preview identified his appointment as one of the most fascinating managerial changes of the summer.
The tactical fit made sense.
Liverpool have historically been comfortable playing at speed, counter-pressing after turnovers and attacking before opponents reorganize.
The challenge involved control.
The first two draws reinforced exactly that concern.
Friday’s performance offered a better balance.
Liverpool were aggressive when the game demanded aggression.
Once they led 2-0, they did not continue playing as though they were losing.
Liverpool’s Opening Three Matches Show the Evolution
| Match | Result | Main Lesson |
|---|---|---|
| Newcastle United vs Liverpool | 2-2 | Attacking resilience, defensive instability |
| Liverpool vs Nottingham Forest | 2-2 | Again recovered twice, but still vulnerable |
| Ipswich Town vs Liverpool | 0-2 | Early efficiency followed by control and a clean sheet |
The difference is obvious.
Liverpool have scored two goals in every league match.
Until Friday, they had also conceded two in every league match.
The attacking output remained constant.
The defensive outcome changed.
Ipswich’s Match Was Damaged Before Their Plan Could Develop
Gary O’Neil’s side entered the match with some reason for confidence despite their promoted status.
Ipswich had beaten Sunderland 2-1 on opening weekend and followed that by beating Leicester City 3-1 in the Carabao Cup.
Manchester United then exposed them in a 5-2 defeat at Old Trafford.
The larger problem against Liverpool was the timing of the goals.
A promoted team facing a Champions League-level opponent usually needs the opening phase to remain stable.
Ipswich lost that phase almost immediately.
Once Isak scored twice inside nine minutes, the entire tactical assignment changed.
Ipswich’s £200 Million Rebuild Still Needs Time
The Tractor Boys did not approach their return to the Premier League conservatively.
They signed 14 senior players during the summer and invested heavily in an attempt to build a squad capable of surviving immediately.
The Sports Encounter’s investigation into Premier League transfer spending highlighted promoted-club expenditure as one of the defining features of the market.
Ipswich were central to that trend.
Julio Enciso, Abdul Fatawu, Exequiel Palacios, Sasa Lukic, Issa Diop, Daizen Maeda and Chuba Akpom were among a long list of arrivals.
The talent level has clearly increased.
The cohesion still needs work.
Liverpool punished that gap quickly.
Portman Road Remains a Comfortable Premier League Ground for Liverpool
Liverpool’s historical record at Ipswich had already been strong before Friday.
The Reds entered unbeaten across all six previous Premier League trips to Portman Road, winning four and drawing two.
They had also won the previous four Premier League meetings between the clubs while scoring 17 goals and conceding only once.
Liverpool’s official statistical preview highlighted those numbers before kickoff.
The latest result extends the pattern.
The First Win Moves Liverpool Into a More Comfortable Table Position
Liverpool now have five points from three matches.
That return will not satisfy a club with Champions League and title ambitions over an entire season.
It looks considerably healthier than three points from three draws would have.
The bigger benefit is psychological.
Iraola no longer has to answer questions about when his first victory will arrive.
Isak has goals.
Gakpo has influence.
Araújo has a clean sheet from his first start.
Barcola has made his debut.
Those individual developments give Liverpool several positive threads to carry into the next phase.
The Champions League Now Raises the Level Immediately
Liverpool do not have long to enjoy the victory.
Atlético Madrid visit Anfield in the Champions League on September 9.
That fixture will provide a considerably more demanding examination of Iraola’s defensive structure.
Ipswich struggled to create sustained pressure after the early goals.
Atlético will present different problems through game management, physicality and transition attacks.
That makes Friday’s clean sheet useful preparation rather than proof that Liverpool’s defensive problems have disappeared.
Why the Post-Salah Liverpool Is Becoming More Collective
The most encouraging aspect of the opening three matches may be that Liverpool’s goals are already being distributed.
Gakpo scored against Newcastle.
Szoboszlai converted the stoppage-time penalty.
Isak and Muñoz scored against Forest.
Isak scored twice at Ipswich.
That pattern matters because replacing Salah was never going to be about finding one player capable of reproducing 250-plus Liverpool goals.
It required building a different attack.
The financial transformation around the club has also added expectations. The Sports Encounter has followed that wider context through the minority investment that increased Liverpool’s financial flexibility.
The club now has resources, talent and a manager with a clear football identity.
The remaining challenge is turning those ingredients into consistency.
What Comes Next for Liverpool?
The schedule now becomes heavier.
Liverpool host Atlético Madrid in Europe before returning to Premier League action against Fulham.
A Carabao Cup meeting with Tottenham follows soon after.
That means Iraola will have to use the squad rather than rely permanently on one starting XI.
Barcola’s arrival helps.
Araújo’s integration helps.
Gakpo’s form makes selection more difficult in a productive way.
Isak’s goals provide the most important reassurance of all.
What Comes Next for Ipswich?
Ipswich remain on three points from their opening three league fixtures.
That is hardly disastrous for a promoted team that has already faced Manchester United and Liverpool.
The concern is defensive.
They have now conceded seven goals across those two matches.
O’Neil’s job is to ensure the heavy summer recruitment produces greater collective organization before defeats against elite opponents begin affecting performances in more winnable fixtures.
The Sports Encounter Verdict
Liverpool did not need a spectacular 90-minute performance at Portman Road.
They needed a win that looked more controlled than the opening two matches.
Isak provided the decisive advantage almost immediately.
Gakpo created both goals.
Araújo helped stabilize the defensive structure on his first start.
Barcola took his first Liverpool minutes from the bench.
Alisson kept the clean sheet.
The final 81 minutes contained fewer dramatic moments than Liverpool’s opening two league games.
Iraola will probably consider that progress.
The first two matches showed Liverpool could recover from problems.
Ipswich showed they could avoid creating so many of them.
That distinction matters as the Champions League begins and stronger opponents arrive.
The Premier League season is still only three matches old, and Liverpool remain far from a finished project.
Friday night provided the first clear view of what Iraola wants that project to become.
Fast enough to punish mistakes.
Controlled enough to protect the damage afterward.
For continuing Premier League, Champions League and international football coverage, visit The Sports Encounter Soccer Hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Ipswich Town vs Liverpool score?
Liverpool defeated Ipswich Town 2-0 at Portman Road in Premier League Matchweek 3.
Who scored Liverpool’s goals against Ipswich?
Alexander Isak scored both Liverpool goals, striking in the sixth and ninth minutes.
Who assisted Alexander Isak’s goals?
Cody Gakpo provided the assist for both of Isak’s goals.
Was this Andoni Iraola’s first Liverpool win?
Yes. Liverpool had drawn their opening two Premier League matches 2-2 against Newcastle United and Nottingham Forest before beating Ipswich.
How many points do Liverpool have after three games?
Liverpool have five points from three Premier League matches following one win and two draws.
Did Ronald Araújo start against Ipswich?
Yes. Araújo made his first Liverpool start and was the only change from the side that began against Nottingham Forest.
Did Bradley Barcola make his Liverpool debut?
Yes. Barcola came off the bench during the second half for his first Liverpool appearance after joining from Paris Saint-Germain.
Was this Liverpool’s first clean sheet of the season?
Yes. Liverpool had conceded twice in each of their opening two Premier League matches before keeping Ipswich scoreless.
How many points do Ipswich have?
Ipswich remain on three points after opening with a victory over Sunderland before defeats against Manchester United and Liverpool.
Who do Liverpool play next?
Liverpool host Atlético Madrid in the UEFA Champions League on September 9 before facing Fulham in their next Premier League match.
Breaking News
Genoa 1-4 Como: Diao Brace and Nico Paz Push Fàbregas’ Unbeaten Side Into Early Serie A Spotlight
Como continued their unbeaten Serie A start with a 4-1 win at Genoa. Assane Diao scored twice, while Martin Baturina and Nico Paz also found the net as Cesc Fàbregas’ side moved to seven points from three away matches before their Champions League campaign begins.
GENOA, Italy, September 4, 2026: Como arrived at the Luigi Ferraris carrying one of the more intriguing questions of the new Serie A season.
Was last year’s fourth-place finish and Champions League qualification the peak of a remarkable rise, or the beginning of something more durable?
Three league matches into 2026-27, Cesc Fàbregas’ side are beginning to supply a convincing answer.
Como beat Genoa 4-1 on Friday night, with Martin Baturina, Assane Diao and Nico Paz turning a difficult opening into another statement result. Diao scored twice, while Baturina and Paz added one each as Como recovered from conceding first and then overwhelmed Daniele De Rossi’s side.
Milutin Osmajic gave Genoa the lead in the 19th minute, but Como responded almost immediately. Baturina equalized in the 25th, Diao made it 2-1 five minutes later, and Paz stretched the advantage to 3-1 before halftime. Diao completed the scoring in the 78th minute.
The result takes Como to seven points from three Serie A matches after an opening draw at Udinese and a 2-1 victory away to Napoli.
Genoa remain on zero after three rounds.
The gap between the teams is becoming about more than one scoreline.
Como are learning how to turn difficult away matches into points. Genoa are learning that competitive periods mean very little when every mistake becomes expensive.
The Sports Encounter’s complete Serie A 2026-27 preview identified Como as one of the most dangerous teams outside the traditional title group because Fàbregas had retained Nico Paz while strengthening a squad preparing for Champions League football.
The first three matches have strengthened that argument.
Genoa 1-4 Como: Match at a Glance
| Match Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Competition | Serie A 2026-27 |
| Matchday | 3 |
| Venue | Stadio Luigi Ferraris, Genoa |
| Date | September 4, 2026 |
| Result | Genoa 1-4 Como |
| Genoa scorer | Milutin Osmajic 19′ |
| Como scorers | Martin Baturina 25′, Assane Diao 30′, Nico Paz 40′, Assane Diao 78′ |
| Como league record | Played 3, Won 2, Drawn 1 |
| Como points | 7 |
| Genoa league record | Played 3, Lost 3 |
| Genoa points | 0 |
The official Lega Serie A website provides the full Matchday 3 schedule, standings and competition information.
Genoa Strike First Through Milutin Osmajic
The opening 20 minutes suggested that Genoa might finally be ready to turn competitive football into a league result.
De Rossi’s side entered the match without a Serie A point and without a league goal through their opening two fixtures.
They had lost 2-0 at home to Napoli and then 1-0 away to Lazio.
That made Osmajic’s 19th-minute goal important for more than the score.
It was Genoa’s first league goal of the season and briefly gave the home crowd something the team had struggled to create in August: a game state they could protect rather than chase.
The problem was how little time Genoa enjoyed that advantage.
Martin Baturina Answers Within Six Minutes
Baturina equalized in the 25th minute.
The Croatian midfielder had already scored in Como’s 2-1 win at Napoli during Matchday 2, and his latest contribution reinforced a useful early pattern.
Como are receiving goals from several areas rather than relying entirely on one forward.
Baturina’s arrival into advanced positions creates another problem for opponents already occupied by Paz, Diao and Tasos Douvikas.
His equalizer also prevented Genoa from settling into a deeper structure around the lead.
Six minutes after the home breakthrough, the match was level again.
Assane Diao Turns the Game Completely
Diao required another five minutes to change the lead.
His first goal arrived in the 30th minute and put Como 2-1 ahead.
The timing was devastating for Genoa because the hosts moved from their first league lead of the season to trailing inside 11 minutes.
Diao’s contribution also underlined why Como’s attacking depth looks stronger than it did during the early stages of their rise.
Fàbregas can now move between different attacking profiles without changing the central idea of his football.
Diao offers direct running and acceleration.
Paz can operate between midfield and defense.
Baturina gives another player capable of progressing the ball and arriving around the box.
Douvikas occupies central defenders and provides a more traditional finishing reference.
That variety becomes difficult to manage once Como establish rhythm.
Nico Paz Makes It 3-1 Before Halftime
Paz scored Como’s third in the 40th minute.
By halftime, the match had moved completely away from Genoa.
The Argentine remains the creative reference point of Fàbregas’ project and was one of the central players highlighted in The Sports Encounter’s early Serie A title-race analysis.
Keeping Paz during the summer may prove as important as any transfer Como completed.
Last season he repeatedly helped the team connect midfield possession with attacking movement. The challenge this year is sustaining that influence while opponents prepare more specifically for him.
Genoa knew what he could do.
They still could not prevent him from scoring.
Como’s First-Half Response Was the Most Impressive Part of the Night
The final score creates the impression that Como controlled the entire match.
The more useful detail is how they responded after falling behind.
| Minute | Event | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 19′ | Milutin Osmajic scores for Genoa | 1-0 |
| 25′ | Martin Baturina equalizes | 1-1 |
| 30′ | Assane Diao puts Como ahead | 1-2 |
| 40′ | Nico Paz adds the third | 1-3 |
| 78′ | Assane Diao scores again | 1-4 |
Como scored three times in 15 minutes after the equalizer.
That is the type of response that separates a team capable of competing around the European places from one still dependent on game momentum.
They did not spend 20 minutes reacting emotionally to conceding.
They accelerated.
Assane Diao Completes the Statement in the 78th Minute
Diao’s second goal arrived in the 78th minute.
By then the result was already heavily tilted toward Como, but the fourth goal mattered because it removed any possibility of a late Genoa recovery.
It also gave Diao a brace in a match where his movement repeatedly stretched the home defense.
That kind of production is particularly useful before Como’s European schedule begins.
Champions League football will force Fàbregas to rotate his attacking players.
A team entering Europe for the first time cannot depend entirely on one combination.
Diao’s performance gives Como another reason to believe their squad is becoming deep enough to survive both competitions.
Como Have Taken Seven Points From Three Away Matches
Perhaps the most remarkable part of Como’s opening month is that all three league fixtures have been away from home.
| Como Match | Result | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Udinese vs Como | 1-1 | 1 |
| Napoli vs Como | 1-2 | 3 |
| Genoa vs Como | 1-4 | 3 |
| Total | Unbeaten | 7 |
The opening-weekend draw at Udinese was already treated positively in The Sports Encounter’s Serie A Matchday 1 wrap.
Como then produced the bigger result at Napoli.
The official club report confirmed that Baturina opened the scoring before Douvikas restored the lead in the 35th minute to complete a 2-1 victory at the Stadio Diego Armando Maradona.
That win made the trip to Genoa interesting.
Friday’s result makes the pattern harder to ignore.
Seven Points From Udine, Naples and Genoa Changes the Conversation
Como entered the campaign with Champions League football creating the biggest uncertainty around their domestic prospects.
The question was never whether the first XI contained enough quality.
Last season had already answered that.
Fàbregas took Como to fourth place with 71 points, 65 goals scored and only 29 conceded.
The Sports Encounter’s season curtain raiser argued that Europe would test the club’s depth more than its tactical identity.
Seven points from three away games give Como an excellent platform before that extra workload begins.
Champions League Football Arrives Next Week
Como’s attention now shifts toward a new chapter in club history.
Their Champions League league-phase campaign begins against RB Leipzig on September 10.
The official Como Champions League ticket announcement confirms that the club is preparing for four home league-phase nights.
The timing gives Friday’s win additional value.
Como can enter Europe with domestic momentum rather than spending the opening weeks trying to repair their Serie A position.
Fàbregas Has Built a Team That No Longer Looks Surprised by Success
Last season, Como’s rise could still be discussed as an extraordinary story.
That framing is becoming outdated.
They finished fourth.
They qualified for the Champions League.
They retained key players.
They have now started the new season unbeaten.
The tactical structure also looks established enough that Como do not need ideal game states to perform.
They drew after going behind at Udinese.
They beat Napoli away.
They went behind against Genoa and scored four.
Those are three different challenges.
Como found a solution to each.
Nico Paz, Baturina and Diao Are Giving Como a Dangerous Three-Line Attack
The attacking structure is becoming one of the most interesting elements of Serie A’s opening weeks.
Baturina has already scored in consecutive league matches.
Paz remains the creative center.
Diao has now produced a two-goal performance.
Douvikas has already scored twice this season and remains a central reference.
This matters because successful possession teams sometimes become predictable when all progression flows through one player.
Como appear less vulnerable to that problem.
Paz can still dictate.
He no longer has to dictate everything.
Genoa’s Situation Is Becoming Serious Earlier Than Expected
For Genoa, the result creates a very different early-season picture.
Three matches.
Three defeats.
The first two came without scoring.
The third produced a first league goal but also four conceded.
De Rossi’s project was one of the managerial stories highlighted in The Sports Encounter’s Serie A preview.
There was reason for optimism because Genoa had enough technical and midfield quality to occupy the competitive middle of the division.
The opening results have placed that optimism under immediate pressure.
Genoa Have Now Lost Twice at Home
The home results are particularly damaging.
Napoli won 2-0 at the Luigi Ferraris on Matchday 1.
Como have now won 4-1 there.
That means Genoa have conceded six goals across two home league fixtures while collecting nothing.
A mid-table side can survive difficult away results.
Repeated home defeats create a much harder season.
Genoa now need their next stretch to establish a reliable base quickly.
Osmajic’s Goal Is One of the Few Immediate Positives
Osmajic at least ended Genoa’s scoring drought.
The importance of that goal should not disappear completely because of what followed.
Genoa had failed to score against Napoli and Lazio.
Breaking that sequence can help attacking confidence.
The concern is what happened after the goal.
A team fighting for its first points cannot concede three times before halftime after moving ahead at home.
That is where De Rossi’s biggest work lies.
Como Are Quietly Becoming Part of the Upper-Serie A Conversation
The early title conversation has understandably centered on Inter, Roma, Milan, Juventus and the other traditional powers.
Roma have been particularly impressive, opening with two four-goal victories. The Sports Encounter’s analysis of Roma’s 4-0 win at Lecce showed how quickly Gasperini’s second-season structure has developed.
Atalanta have also remained perfect, including a dramatic 96th-minute victory over Bologna.
Como now belong in the next layer of that discussion.
Seven points from three away fixtures is too substantial to dismiss as an easy opening schedule.
Napoli and Genoa away are exactly the kinds of matches teams competing around the Champions League places need to survive.
Como have won both.
The Early Serie A Table Is Becoming More Interesting
Matchday 3 has only just started, so the table will continue changing throughout the weekend.
Como have nevertheless already done enough to put pressure on the clubs playing after them.
Seven points means Fàbregas’ team remain unbeaten and can watch the weekend’s major fixtures from a strong position.
Inter face Napoli.
Juventus meet Milan.
Roma host Atalanta.
Several teams near the top therefore have to take points directly from one another.
Como have already banked theirs.
Why This Matters Before Inter, Napoli and Juventus-Milan
Friday’s fixture was the opening match of a fascinating Serie A weekend.
The official Matchday 3 schedule includes Inter-Napoli, Roma-Atalanta and Juventus-Milan.
Those fixtures guarantee dropped points among leading clubs.
Como’s victory therefore has table implications beyond Genoa.
A seven-point start gives them enough early security to treat Champions League football as an opportunity rather than an immediate threat to domestic survival.
Como’s Rise Is Becoming One of Serie A’s Most Important Structural Stories
The broader significance goes beyond three matches.
Serie A has spent several years asking whether clubs outside the traditional powers can build something sustainable.
Atalanta provided one model.
Bologna produced another.
Como are creating their own.
The project combines strong investment with a clear coaching identity, young attacking talent and a willingness to recruit players capable of developing rather than simply arriving with reputation.
Fàbregas is central to that structure.
The club is no longer succeeding because opponents underestimate it.
Everyone knows what Como are capable of.
They are still winning.
The Sports Encounter Verdict
Como’s 4-1 victory at Genoa matters because of the pattern around it.
They drew at Udinese.
They won at Napoli.
They have now won at Genoa.
Every one of their opening league matches has been away from home.
They remain unbeaten.
Friday’s match also showed another step in their development.
Genoa scored first.
Como did not lose structure.
Baturina equalized.
Diao changed the lead.
Paz created separation.
Diao finished the job.
That sequence looked like a team accustomed to solving problems rather than hoping momentum solves them.
Champions League football will create a much harder workload beginning next week.
The question around Como is therefore still alive.
Can this squad maintain its domestic standard while entering Europe for the first time?
Seven points from three away games gives Fàbregas an excellent place to begin finding out.
For continuing Serie A, Champions League and global football coverage, visit The Sports Encounter Soccer Hub.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Genoa vs Como score?
Como defeated Genoa 4-1 at the Stadio Luigi Ferraris in Serie A Matchday 3.
Who scored for Como against Genoa?
Martin Baturina, Assane Diao and Nico Paz scored for Como. Diao scored twice.
Who scored Genoa’s goal?
Milutin Osmajic gave Genoa the lead in the 19th minute.
When did Assane Diao score?
Diao scored in the 30th and 78th minutes.
How many points do Como have after three matches?
Como have seven points from three matches after two wins and one draw.
Are Como unbeaten in Serie A?
Yes. Como opened with a 1-1 draw at Udinese before beating Napoli 2-1 and Genoa 4-1.
How many points do Genoa have?
Genoa remain without a point after losing their opening three league matches.
Who scored Como’s third goal?
Nico Paz scored in the 40th minute to give Como a 3-1 lead before halftime.
Who do Como play next in Europe?
Como begin their UEFA Champions League league-phase campaign against RB Leipzig on September 10, 2026.
How did Como perform last season?
Como finished fourth in Serie A in 2025-26 and qualified for the UEFA Champions League.
-
Editor's Choice4 weeks agoPremier League 2026–27 Curtain Raiser: Fixtures, Teams, Title Contenders, Transfers and Season Predictions
-
Editor's Choice4 weeks agoWhen Will Lionel Messi Retire? Argentina President Says Only Messi Has the Answer
-
Editor's Choice4 weeks agoWhich of Last Season’s Premier League Top 10 Can Actually Win the 2026-27 Title?
