Can Pakistan Bounce Back in England? Babar Azam May Help, but Lord’s Demands Much More

Pakistan need Babar Azam back at Lord’s.

They probably need him badly.

What they need even more, however, is a functioning Test team around him.

England’s innings-and-103-run victory at Headingley exposed problems that cannot be solved by inserting one elite batter into the middle order. Pakistan were bowled out for 171 and 135. They conceded 409. England’s seamers controlled both innings, Pakistan’s batting repeatedly lost shape after brief periods of resistance, and the visitors were beaten before tea on the third day.

Now comes Lord’s.

The second Test begins on August 27 with Pakistan 1-0 down in the three-match series and facing a simple mathematical reality. Another defeat ends their chance of winning the series. A draw keeps the contest alive. Victory would transform everything and send the teams to Edgbaston level at 1-1.

Pakistan have recovered from ugly Test defeats before. Only weeks ago, they lost the opening Test in the West Indies by 90 runs before making four changes, altering the balance of the XI and winning the second Test by eight wickets. That result ended an eight-match overseas losing streak and showed that this squad can respond when selection matches conditions. The Sports Encounter’s West Indies series review examined how radically Pakistan changed their approach between those two Tests.

Lord’s therefore presents a familiar question in a much harsher environment.

Does Pakistan react intelligently, or does it merely change names?

Babar’s fitness is the most obvious selection issue. Mohammad Rizwan’s place is being debated. Salman Ali Agha has gone too long without producing the sort of innings expected from a senior all-rounder. Imam-ul-Haq and Azan Awais have not established a convincing opening partnership. Shan Masood is still rebuilding confidence after injury. Abdullah Shafique is carrying an increasingly heavy burden.

Pakistan’s bowling attack, despite Ali Usman’s five wickets at Headingley, also lacks the range of threats that once made the country so difficult to prepare for overseas.

Those questions are connected.

Pakistan cannot solve Lord’s by answering them separately.

Headingley Explained the Size of Pakistan’s Problem

The scoreline looks brutal because the match itself was brutal.

Abdullah Shafique made 61 in the first innings. Imam contributed 42. Their 91-run partnership briefly gave Pakistan something resembling stability after Azan Awais fell to the first ball of the match and Shan Masood followed for five.

Then the innings collapsed.

Saud Shakeel made five.

Salman Ali Agha made 21.

Mohammad Rizwan made 12.

Pakistan were dismissed for 171 in 48.1 overs.

Ollie Robinson took 5 for 51 and Josh Tongue 5 for 46, meaning England did not require a wicket from Jofra Archer or Gus Atkinson to destroy Pakistan’s first innings. The complete figures are available through the official PCB Headingley Test scorecard.

England then turned Pakistan’s weak total into a 238-run first-innings deficit.

Harry Brook made 91.

Jordan Cox scored 72.

Joe Root contributed 66.

Dan Lawrence made 51.

Ali Usman’s maiden Test five-wicket haul was a genuine achievement, while Khurram Shahzad took three wickets. But England still reached 409.

The second Pakistan innings was even more damaging.

Rizwan top-scored with 41 from 39 balls. Shan made 29. Abdullah followed his first-innings fifty with 15. Saud made 14. Salman made four.

Pakistan disappeared for 135 in 37.3 overs.

Robinson, Tongue and Archer took three wickets each, and Atkinson claimed the other dismissal. Robinson and Tongue therefore finished with eight wickets apiece across the match.

This matters when discussing selection because Headingley was not lost by one malfunctioning department.

England were better at batting.

England were better at seam bowling.

England were better in the field.

England handled the conditions better.

And England looked like a side with clearer individual roles.

Pakistan looked like a team still trying to discover what its best Test XI actually is.

Will Babar Azam Return at Lord’s?

This remains the biggest question before the second Test.

Babar missed Headingley after being struck on the right hand during Pakistan’s warm-up match in Beckenham. Head coach Sarfaraz Ahmed publicly expressed hope before the first Test that the captain would return at Lord’s.

That optimism has not yet produced a confirmed clearance.

According to The Express Tribune’s August 24 report, swelling in Babar’s injured finger was still present and he had not practised for four days. Pakistan planned further sessions in London before the Test, leaving his availability dependent on how the hand responds.

Before the series, The Sports Encounter examined why Pakistan had to make a medical decision rather than an emotional one over Babar’s hand injury.

That principle remains unchanged.

If Babar can grip the bat normally, field without protecting the hand and face short-pitched bowling without hesitation, he should play.

If he cannot, Pakistan should not send a compromised version of their captain into a Test merely because the series is slipping away.

Babar Would Improve Pakistan, but He Cannot Repair Everything

The temptation will be to frame his return as the missing ingredient.

That is too simplistic.

Babar would immediately strengthen three areas:

• Pakistan regain their most experienced specialist batter.
• They regain their designated Test captain.
• England have to prepare for the Pakistan batter most capable of producing a long innings under pressure.

His importance was visible during the West Indies tour. In the opening Test, Babar remained unbeaten on 58 while Pakistan collapsed to 120 chasing 211. Our analysis of that defeat showed how isolated Babar became while wickets disappeared around him.

That same problem would remain at Lord’s if the rest of the batting order does not improve.

Babar can transform a fragile middle order.

He cannot repeatedly rescue an entire innings without support.

If Babar Returns, Who Makes Way?

This is where Pakistan’s selection becomes complicated.

Babar should not be pushed into the opening role simply because Imam and Azan have struggled to establish themselves as a pair.

His greatest value remains in the middle order, preferably at No. 4.

Pakistan therefore have two broad routes.

Option One: Leave Out Azan and Move Abdullah Shafique Up

This is the cleaner batting solution.

Abdullah is a natural top-order player who has opened successfully in Test cricket before.

He also enters Lord’s with the strongest recent batting case in Pakistan’s squad.

Abdullah produced an unbeaten 160 in Trinidad after returning to the side, a performance that powered Pakistan’s series-leveling victory. That innings ended Pakistan’s eight-match overseas Test losing streak.

He then made 61 at Headingley.

If Pakistan want to restore Babar without disrupting the middle order unnecessarily, moving Abdullah to the top alongside Imam has considerable logic.

Azan would be unfortunate to lose his place after one Test in England, particularly when his first innings began with arguably the most difficult possible introduction.

But Test selection cannot be separated from the balance of the XI.

Option Two: Babar Replaces Salman Ali Agha

Pakistan could instead retain Azan and Imam while removing Salman.

That would protect the young opener from a one-Test judgment and leave Abdullah in the middle order.

The concern is balance.

Salman provides off-spin and has traditionally occupied the flexible No. 7 role.

If Pakistan remove him, the selectors need either enough bowling from the top six or an all-rounder capable of preventing the tail from beginning too early.

That is where Aamir Jamal becomes particularly relevant.

Are Imam-ul-Haq and Azan Awais Running Out of Time?

Imam’s 42 at Headingley was valuable.

It should not be described as a failure.

The concern is that Pakistan desperately need their opening combination to survive enough of the new ball that Shan, Babar, Saud and Rizwan are not constantly beginning against fresh seamers while the Dukes ball is still moving sharply.

Azan’s first-ball dismissal was the worst possible beginning.

He should not be discarded purely because Robinson trapped him lbw with the first delivery of the series.

He made nine in the second innings before Archer removed him.

Those scores are poor, but they remain a tiny sample in extremely difficult conditions.

The problem for Azan is not only his own output.

It is competition.

Abdullah is scoring runs.

Babar may return.

Saud is available.

Pakistan therefore have more specialist batters than positions if the captain is cleared.

If Babar plays, Azan becomes one obvious omission unless the management decides Salman’s lack of batting output has become the bigger problem.

Is Pakistan Asking Too Much From Abdullah Shafique?

Possibly.

Abdullah returned in the West Indies and responded with an unbeaten 160.

He then arrived at Headingley and made 61 while Pakistan’s first innings broke down around him.

Now he may be asked to change position again and help solve the opening problem.

That is a lot of responsibility for one batter.

The answer is not to protect Abdullah from responsibility. Test batters are supposed to carry it.

The answer is to stop making him responsible for everybody else.

If Abdullah opens at Lord’s, Pakistan should not expect another hundred merely because he currently looks like their most secure batter.

Imam needs to contribute.

Shan needs to contribute.

Babar, if fit, needs to contribute.

Saud needs to contribute.

Rizwan needs to contribute.

Pakistan’s recent batting problem has repeatedly been that one substantial innings becomes a substitute for collective output. Our analysis before the second West Indies Test examined how severely Pakistan’s batting had been deteriorating when pressure increased.

Headingley produced another version of the same problem.

Mohammad Rizwan or Muhammad Ghazi Ghori?

This debate needs perspective.

Muhammad Ghazi Ghori is an uncapped wicketkeeper-batter in Pakistan’s England Test squad. His presence means Rizwan no longer operates without a younger alternative behind him.

That does not mean Lord’s is automatically the right place to make the change.

Rizwan had a poor first innings at Headingley, making 12.

He then top-scored with 41 from 39 balls in the second innings while Pakistan collapsed around him.

Dropping the only Pakistan batter to reach 40 in that innings would be difficult to justify based purely on Headingley.

Rizwan also offers extensive wicketkeeping experience in conditions where late movement after the ball passes the bat can make standing behind the stumps unusually demanding.

Ghori should be viewed as a legitimate future competitor.

The PCB’s original Test squad announcement identified him among the uncapped players deliberately brought into Pakistan’s red-ball setup.

For Lord’s, however, wicketkeeper is not Pakistan’s most urgent problem.

Rizwan should retain his place.

Salman Ali Agha: How Much Longer Can Pakistan Wait?

This is a more serious selection question.

Salman made 21 in Pakistan’s first innings at Headingley and four in the second.

Those scores are disappointing, but the concern extends beyond one Test.

Pakistan increasingly require Salman to function as a senior middle-order batter, secondary spinner and leadership figure. That package only retains its value if the primary disciplines are producing enough.

At Headingley, captaincy added another responsibility.

If Babar returns, that burden disappears.

The selectors then have to ask a straightforward question:

Is Salman currently among Pakistan’s best seven batting options for Lord’s?

If the answer is no, part-time off-spin should not guarantee his position.

His place becomes particularly vulnerable if Pakistan retain Ali Usman as the frontline spinner or add Sajid Khan, because the XI already contains dedicated slow bowling.

Salman still offers flexibility.

He can bat at seven.

He can break partnerships.

He has international experience.

But versatility only matters when it produces tangible value.

Shan Masood Is Fighting Two Opponents at Once

Shan’s Headingley scores were five and 29.

The second innings offered more resistance, but he remains in a difficult phase.

He fractured his left index finger during the first West Indies Test, missed the second Test and only returned to full batting work shortly before the England series.

Physical recovery and batting confidence are not always the same thing.

A player can be medically cleared while still subconsciously protecting an injured hand.

That becomes particularly relevant in England, where the ball can climb unexpectedly and attack the gloves from a good length.

Shan’s challenge at Lord’s is therefore technical and psychological.

He needs to trust the hand.

He also needs to rediscover the decisive movement and controlled aggression that have helped him succeed in county cricket.

Pakistan should persist with him.

Replacing an experienced batter immediately after his return from injury would create another layer of instability.

Pakistan’s Bowling Problem Is More Complicated Than Mohammad Abbas

Headingley produced one apparently contradictory statistic.

Pakistan conceded 409, yet Ali Usman took five wickets and Khurram Shahzad took three.

Those figures might suggest the bowling attack worked reasonably well.

The 238-run first-innings deficit says otherwise.

Pakistan took wickets, but they did not control enough phases of England’s innings.

The problem was not only wicket-taking ability.

It was the absence of sustained pressure and variety.

Pakistan once arrived in England with attacks containing combinations of left-arm pace, high pace, reverse swing and wrist-spin, forcing batters to continually alter their methods.

The current squad contains competent seam bowlers.

Competence and variety are not the same thing.

The Sports Encounter previously examined this wider issue through Shaheen Shah Afridi’s red-ball career crossroads and Pakistan’s changing pace identity.

Mohammad Abbas: Has the Formula Become Too Predictable?

English conditions should theoretically suit Abbas better than almost anywhere else.

He bowls straight.

He attacks the edge.

He can maintain an excellent line when his rhythm is right.

At Headingley, however, he returned 1 for 78 from 25 overs.

When the ball stops moving, his lack of pace reduces the margin for error.

England’s batters can leave confidently, move down the pitch or wait for anything overpitched.

At 36, Abbas is not suddenly going to become a 145kph fast bowler.

Pakistan therefore have to judge whether his present version can still create enough uncertainty at Lord’s.

The reputation of English conditions should not make his selection automatic.

Khurram Shahzad Took Three Wickets, but at a Heavy Cost

Khurram’s three wickets complicate any decision to remove him.

Wickets matter.

So does conceding 133 runs from 21.5 overs.

Pakistan need at least one seamer capable of maintaining pressure while another attacks.

Khurram created chances and took wickets, but the scoring rate was too high to provide that control.

What Bowling Options Can Pakistan Use at Lord’s?

For this Test, the debate should stay within the resources Pakistan actually brought to England.

The selectors cannot redesign the entire national bowling pool three days before a Test match.

The broader question about players such as Naseem Shah, Shaheen Afridi, Abrar Ahmed, Sufiyan Muqeem, Akif Javed, Ali Raza, Hunain Shah and Shadab Khan belongs in Pakistan’s longer-term Test planning after this series.

Lord’s is about making the best use of the squad already in England.

Should Ubaid Shah Play at Lord’s?

This would be the bold selection call.

Ubaid potentially gives Pakistan something Abbas cannot: greater pace and youthful aggression.

Lord’s can reward a fuller length with the new ball, but the ground’s slope and bounce can also help a bowler willing to attack the splice and body.

England already know what Abbas wants to do.

They know what Mohammad Ali wants to do.

Ubaid would at least pose a different examination.

The risk is obvious.

A young fast bowler can disappear quickly at Lord’s if his length is wrong.

But Pakistan are 1-0 down.

There comes a point when repeating the safer combination becomes more dangerous than trying something different.

Could Aamir Jamal Solve Two Problems at Once?

Aamir Jamal may be the most interesting balance option if Pakistan believe he is physically ready for a proper Test workload.

He offers seam bowling while strengthening the lower order.

That could allow Pakistan to remove Salman, retain a frontline spinner and still avoid a dangerously long tail.

Jamal also gives the captain greater flexibility if one specialist seamer struggles.

His inclusion should depend on bowling readiness, not merely his batting value.

A Test all-rounder has to be capable of contributing meaningful overs.

Ali Usman Has Earned Another Test

This should be one of the simpler calls.

Ali Usman took his maiden Test five-wicket haul at Headingley and became the first Pakistan left-arm spinner to take a Test five-for in England.

Pakistan cannot complain about a lack of bowling variety and then remove the bowler who provides the clearest different angle.

He can bowl long spells.

He can attack right-handers from around the wicket.

He gives Pakistan control when the pitch flattens.

Unless the Lord’s surface is so green that Pakistan decide on an extreme seam-heavy combination, Ali should retain his place.

What Is Pakistan’s Best XI at Lord’s?

Assuming Babar is fully fit and Aamir Jamal is ready to bowl a genuine Test workload, Pakistan can make meaningful changes without turning the XI upside down.

TSE Preferred Pakistan XI

That XI carries conditions-based assumptions.

If Jamal cannot handle a significant bowling workload, Salman becomes more difficult to leave out because Pakistan need a seventh batter and another bowling option.

If the pitch looks exceptionally green, another specialist seamer could replace the spinner.

If Lord’s looks dry, Sajid Khan enters the discussion.

The principles matter more than locking in the XI two days before the toss:

• Bring Babar back only if he is genuinely fit.
• Consider Abdullah for an opening role rather than moving Babar out of his strongest position.
• Retain Rizwan.
• Retain Ali Usman.
• Add more pace or all-round flexibility through Ubaid or Jamal if conditions support it.
• Do not select Abbas simply because the match is being played in England.

Could Pakistan Play Sajid Khan and Ali Usman Together?

Yes, but only if the Lord’s pitch justifies it.

Pakistan used Sajid and Ali together successfully in Trinidad. Both took four wickets in West Indies’ second innings as Pakistan won by eight wickets. That spin combination was central to Pakistan’s comeback in the Caribbean.

Lord’s is different.

Pakistan cannot pick a combination because it worked in Port of Spain.

If conditions demand seam, they need seam.

If the surface is dry enough to bring spin increasingly into the match, Sajid and Ali could offer England two very different challenges.

The decision should be made after inspecting the surface and considering the weather, not before.

Pakistan’s Fielding Has Become a Competitive Handicap

Fielding receives less attention than batting because a dropped catch is not recorded beside a batter’s name like a duck.

It can be equally damaging.

England’s fielding at Headingley was sharp and energetic.

Joe Root’s field placements also created wickets. Azan’s second-innings dismissal at leg slip gave Root his 219th Test catch as a fielder, taking him past Steven Smith’s 218 according to the PCB match report.

Pakistan’s standards have been less reliable.

That cannot continue at Lord’s.

English conditions produce edges. Every slip chance matters.

A seamer can spend six overs constructing a dismissal.

If the catch is dropped, much of that work disappears instantly.

Who Can Inspire the Fielding Improvement?

Babar’s return would help because leadership tone matters, but fielding excellence cannot belong to one man.

Rizwan remains one of the most energetic senior figures.

Abdullah is a strong catcher.

Saud and Salman need to raise their intensity.

The coaches should also settle the slip cordon instead of continually moving personnel.

Pakistan need specialists who know their positions and build familiarity with the angles produced by each bowler.

Fielding in England demands anticipation.

Reacting only after the edge is already travelling is often too late.

Pakistan Have Won at Lord’s Before

There is genuine historical evidence that Pakistan can compete at the ground.

According to the PCB, Pakistan have won five Tests at Lord’s: 1982, 1992, 1996, 2016 and 2018.

That history should not be treated as a prediction.

It is still relevant.

Lord’s has rewarded Pakistan teams that bowled with discipline and had enough batting resilience to survive difficult periods.

The 2016 side possessed something this current team is still searching for: clarity.

Misbah-ul-Haq knew his role.

Younis Khan knew his role.

Yasir Shah provided genuine wicket-taking spin.

Mohammad Amir and Rahat Ali offered contrasting seam angles.

The modern team does not need to reproduce those names.

It needs to reproduce that level of role definition.

Can Shan Masood Recover His Best at Lord’s?

Pakistan need him to.

Shan has county experience and understands the rhythm of batting in England better than most players in the touring group.

His second-innings 29 at Headingley was hardly a major score, but it represented greater resistance than his first-innings five.

Pakistan cannot afford Shan becoming trapped between survival and scoring.

His better Test innings usually involve controlled positive intent.

That does not mean chasing wide deliveries.

It means committing fully when the ball is there to score from and leaving decisively when it is not.

The injured finger cannot dominate his thinking.

If Shan is still mentally protecting his hand, England will notice quickly and attack his body and gloves.

The Real Question Is Whether Pakistan Can Score 300

Almost every other tactical debate becomes secondary if Pakistan continue producing totals of 171 and 135.

The first target at Lord’s should be straightforward:

Pakistan need a competitive first-innings total, preferably around or above 300.

The Sports Encounter’s pre-series analysis identified first-innings batting as one of the decisive areas of this tour.

Headingley demonstrated why.

Pakistan made 171.

England replied with 409.

The match was effectively broken before Pakistan started their second innings.

At Lord’s, Pakistan need to make England bat under scoreboard pressure at least once.

What Pakistan Must Do Differently at Lord’s

Can Pakistan Actually Beat England at Lord’s?

Yes.

That answer should not be confused with saying Pakistan are favorites.

England deserve that status after Headingley.

Robinson and Tongue took 16 wickets between them across the match.

England produced four individual scores above 50 in their only innings.

Root looked comfortable in his return to the captaincy.

The fielding was sharper.

The seamers understood how to exploit the conditions.

Pakistan’s situation is still not hopeless.

They have won at Lord’s five times.

They already recovered from a 1-0 deficit once this summer in the Caribbean.

Abdullah is in form.

Ali Usman has just taken a Test five-for.

Rizwan showed second-innings resistance.

Saud remains capable of occupying the crease.

Shan knows English conditions.

And Babar may return.

The ingredients exist.

The problem is that Pakistan have not yet put enough of them together in the same Test.

Babar Azam Is an Answer, Not the Answer

This distinction should frame Pakistan’s entire preparation.

Babar’s inclusion improves the XI.

It does not correct Imam’s judgment outside off stump.

It does not remove pressure from Abdullah.

It does not make Salman score runs.

It does not restore Shan’s confidence.

It does not add pace to Abbas.

It does not create bowling variety that is not present in the touring squad.

It does not take catches.

Pakistan returned to Babar as Test captain because the previous leadership cycle had failed to arrest the team’s red-ball decline. The Sports Encounter’s analysis of his captaincy return warned that changing the leader would not automatically repair Pakistan’s Test structure.

The same warning applies now.

Changing one batter will not repair the team unless the players around him take responsibility.

A Draw Would Matter More Than It Sounds

Pakistan should not walk into Lord’s playing for a draw.

That is different from understanding what a draw would achieve.

If Pakistan leave London still 1-0 behind, the third Test at Edgbaston remains alive.

England cannot treat the series as completed.

Babar receives more recovery time if the hand remains an issue.

The tourists gain another Test’s worth of experience in English conditions.

Most importantly, Pakistan halt the psychological damage caused by Headingley.

A competitive draw built around a substantial first-innings total, long partnerships and disciplined bowling could restore considerably more confidence than another reckless collapse in pursuit of a low-percentage victory.

Victory would obviously change the series completely.

But Pakistan first need to become competitive again.

The Lord’s Test Could Define Several Careers, Not Only the Series

Salman’s place is under pressure.

Azan’s opportunity could disappear if Babar returns.

Imam needs to turn starts into substantial innings.

Abbas has to prove that control still compensates for reduced pace.

Khurram must show that wickets can come without conceding runs at an unsustainable rate.

Shan needs runs after injury.

Rizwan has a younger wicketkeeper waiting in the squad.

Even Babar faces a personal test.

If he returns, he does so not only as Pakistan’s premier batter but as the captain being asked to help rescue a series immediately after injury.

That gives Lord’s considerably more weight than an ordinary second Test.

Pakistan Have Already Shown They Can Respond to a Heavy Defeat

The most encouraging precedent is recent.

Pakistan lost the first Test in the West Indies and then changed four players for the second.

Abdullah returned and made 160 not out.

Sajid Khan and Ali Usman combined to destroy West Indies in the second innings.

Pakistan won by eight wickets and ended an eight-match overseas losing sequence.

The turnaround came because the team changed according to conditions rather than simply asking the same combination to perform better.

The Caribbean tour had begun as the first major test of Babar’s restored red-ball leadership. It ended with evidence that Pakistan can still make intelligent corrections during a series.

Lord’s requires another correction.

This one will be harder.

England are stronger than West Indies and already possess detailed evidence of where Pakistan’s batters struggled at Headingley.

Robinson, Tongue, Archer and Atkinson give Root several different seam options.

Pakistan will have to adjust rather than simply hope conditions become easier.

TSE Verdict: Pakistan Can Come Back, but Selection Must Match Reality

Pakistan have enough cricketing ability to compete with England at Lord’s.

What they do not have is enough margin for another confused selection or another collective batting failure.

If Babar is fully fit, he should return in the middle order.

Abdullah Shafique should be considered for an opening role if that is the cleanest way to accommodate the captain.

Rizwan should keep his place.

Ali Usman should play again after his five wickets at Headingley.

Pakistan should seriously consider greater pace or all-round flexibility through Ubaid Shah or Aamir Jamal rather than automatically repeating the same seam combination.

Salman Ali Agha should face genuine selection pressure.

Shan Masood deserves another Test but now needs to convert experience into runs.

Fielding standards must improve immediately.

And the entire batting order needs to understand that Abdullah cannot be expected to keep rescuing innings because he happens to be Pakistan’s most convincing recent run-scorer.

The Sports Encounter’s review of the drawn West Indies series showed that Pakistan are capable of responding when the selectors identify the correct problem rather than merely replacing a player.

Lord’s now demands the same clarity.

Test series can change quickly.

A substantial opening partnership can change a morning.

A first-innings hundred can transform the scoreboard.

A new-ball spell can put England 30 for three.

A difficult catch can remove Root or Brook before either settles.

A Babar Azam innings can alter the emotional state of an entire dressing room.

Pakistan do have enough talent to win at Lord’s.

The uncomfortable question is whether enough of that talent can deliver at the same time.

Babar can help turn the series.

He cannot turn it alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Pakistan still win the Test series against England?

Yes. England lead 1-0 with Tests remaining at Lord’s and Edgbaston. Pakistan need to avoid defeat at Lord’s to remain alive in the series and must win both remaining Tests if they want to win the series outright.

When is the second England vs Pakistan Test?

The second Test is scheduled at Lord’s from August 27 to 31, 2026.

Will Babar Azam play the second Test at Lord’s?

His participation has not yet been officially confirmed. As of the August 24 fitness update, swelling remained in his injured finger and he had not practised for four days. Pakistan are monitoring his recovery before making the final decision.

Who should Babar replace if he returns?

One logical option is to leave out Azan Awais, move Abdullah Shafique into the opening position with Imam-ul-Haq and restore Babar in the middle order. Pakistan could alternatively leave out Salman Ali Agha if they can maintain the bowling balance through Aamir Jamal or another combination.

Should Pakistan drop Mohammad Rizwan for Muhammad Ghazi Ghori?

Probably not for Lord’s. Rizwan scored 41 in Pakistan’s second innings at Headingley and remains the more experienced wicketkeeper in English Test conditions. Ghori should remain a genuine future competitor.

How many runs did Salman Ali Agha score at Headingley?

Salman scored 21 in Pakistan’s first innings and four in the second innings.

Should Salman Ali Agha retain his place?

His place should be under genuine pressure. His off-spin and lower-order flexibility remain useful, but Pakistan need substantially more batting output from a senior player occupying a top-seven position.

Who can replace Mohammad Abbas or Khurram Shahzad?

The alternatives already in Pakistan’s England squad include Ubaid Shah and Aamir Jamal. Mohammad Ali is another seam option, while Sajid Khan becomes relevant if Pakistan want an additional frontline spinner.

Should Ali Usman play the second Test?

Yes, unless the Lord’s pitch overwhelmingly demands an all-seam attack. Ali took five wickets in England’s first innings at Headingley and gives Pakistan an important left-arm spin angle.

How many Tests have Pakistan won at Lord’s?

Pakistan have won five Tests at Lord’s, in 1982, 1992, 1996, 2016 and 2018.

What does Pakistan need most at Lord’s?

Pakistan need collective batting responsibility. A competitive first-innings total around or above 300 would give the bowlers something meaningful to work with and prevent England from controlling the match immediately as they did at Headingley.